MosesMcNeil99
Well-Known Member
Im not sure it’s positive or negative developments really - seems to me to be as you were. Rangers have actually openly accepted we owe damages to SDI.The ‘monumental bill’ in the short term would/could be to Elite/Hummel is what I’m saying mate not to the Fat C*nt. You appear to be bypassing that possibility.
I also didn’t say the cap would be removed. I said he hadn’t ruled on it one way or the other.
My understanding is that the outcome is that we are forced back to SDI. We are likely to have to pay the penalty for breach. Let’s say that is £1m. SDI are also due a share of the profits from last year and the forthcoming year. Elite/Hummel will be in a position to sue us for breach of contract as well.
All I see is vast sums of money going out the Club and us being forced back into a never-ending deal with SDI.
If you can see positives in that please do tell.
Regarding Elite/Hummel i think its naive at best to assume they weren’t aware of our current situation at the time and find it highly unlikely we would’ve gotten in to a deal knowingly that we were open to further damages from those parties due to an unforeseen ruling from the courts - this was always going to happen. That’s speculation of course but I’m not concerned it will come to that.
I don’t think we will be dealing with SDI next year either as the courts have already tried last time to force us down that route and we completely ignored it - we will likely do that again. The courts are limited in their remedies here which has been somewhat acknowledged in the ruling.
Last edited: