Delboy Trotter
Well-Known Member
I really don’t see an issue
I don’t think they were implying anything sinister
I don’t think they were implying anything sinister
Cracked club crests out the question now?I can see what they are trying to point out but unless they have Tav or the gaffers permission to do this it’s out of bounds.
Like it or not Tav and Gerrard are brands. If they took a liberty like this with a Nike label they‘d get sued.
Brands? I thought they were human beings.I can see what they are trying to point out but unless they have Tav or the gaffers permission to do this it’s out of bounds.
Like it or not Tav and Gerrard are brands. If they took a liberty like this with a Nike label they‘d get sued.
they are human beings with image rightsBrands? I thought they were human beings.
Fair point.Cracked club crests out the question now?
I just think we're getting into a tizzy about nothing.they are human beings with image rights
why do you think Gerrard gets to promote water
why do players get money to wear a certain type of boot
if their image is altered and it affects their ability to make money i could be wrong but I would think there would be case to answer for
So what would you defend your fortress with? Bags of flour? Water balloons? PMSL"A well-intentioned attempt at illustrating the article"?
From the Cambridge dictionary ......
fortress
noun [ C ]
UK
/ˈfɔː.trəs/ US
/ˈfɔːr.trəs/
a large, strong building or group of buildings that can be defended from attack
...........
So, not a couple of men with guns.
They are illiterate imbeciles.
That's the problem with most Rangers men they don't care enough.I didn’t really care about it but I doubt Gerrard and Tavernier would want superimposed images of themselves in the papers holding guns.
Have you?.seen worse
That's us told then.In this day and age, you cant publish things like this as someone somewhere will be offended.
In my opinion, its hardly offensive and people need to stop getting their knickers in a twist over such things.
If that were Celtic players in Balaclavas with a Celtic logo our fans would be going ballistic! 100% in agreement!Totally inappropriate mate, imho.
Lol, no it wasn't.The photo makes them look very para-military-esque. If they had to use guns, why not in a Dads Army type way. The photo is designed to portray us in an un-sympathetic way.
Yeah this, if the club didn’t like it then it’s their right to seek a retraction.A lot of posters appear to be missing the point completely here.
That gutter rag printed an apology because Rangers, Stevie, Tav or both didn't like the images that were portrayed of them. It doesn't matter if FFers were offended or not, and if you're criticizing the need for a retraction, you're anti- woke sentiments are targeted at Rangers, Tav, Stevie G or all of them. It was a tasteless and pathetic image to print, imo, but you'd expect nothing less from The Sun.
Yeah this, if the club didn’t like it then it’s their right to seek a retraction.
I don’t see much wrong with it, but as outlined earlier I think it’s more just Rangers flexing their muscle & showing the fans what they can do.
That’s the wrong person and context imo.It just needs to be in the right context...
I agree, that’s the problem though. One half of a demographic/people are going to perceive it thru whatever lens. And I know it’s a cop, same thing tho some people would consider it implies, militarism, totalitarianism, far right etc.You only see paramilitary in there if you really want to. They’ve been shopped on to a British cop.
Theres a lot of double standards on here.If that were Celtic players in Balaclavas with a Celtic logo our fans would be going ballistic! 100% in agreement!
Just a bit of fun.That’s the wrong person and context imo.
That's the problem with most Rangers men they don't care enough.