Leif Erikson
Well-Known Member
Teeny. Caught out for offside goal. A target for side. Tricky going forward.
The stupidest post I've read in a while.
Have you somehow mixed up 'teeny' Yilmaz with big Goldson?
Teeny. Caught out for offside goal. A target for side. Tricky going forward.
Haven't seen anyone say he's been good. Previous evidence would suggest he's good, but we've not really had a chance to see for ourselves. Most people understand it'll take more than 150 minutes or whatever he's had. It’s people saying "not for me" and writing him off who are being rightly criticised.People pretend he's good with no real evidence to back it up - it's just hope/optimism
Nothing wrong with that but let's not kid ourselves. He's not shown much so far (good or bad, he looks ok). But he's young so does have plenty time to improve.
As UNUSUAL, first reply makes a cünt of itHe’s not for me… i’ll leave it at that
First goal Yilmaz held the line with, himself Davies and Tav. Goldson fukked the offside, and then failed to block the cross.They targeted him. He coped ok but it was obvious that teams will target him due to his lack of height.
He was off the pace a little but that will improve with match time. Show some nice touches. Crossing too near the keeper.
First goal happened down his side but I'm more inclined to look across the line as he had moved up as he should have done.
Lets see what he does if he can get a few games in his legs.
Odd signing. 5/10
First goal Yilmaz held the line with, himself Davies and Tav. Goldson fukked the offside, and then failed to block the cross.
The first goal was absolutely not his fault whatsoever
Yilmaz does look like Hasbulla in those pics.Might be related to this.
Who is Hasbulla? Real age, UFC contract and his condition explained
Hasbulla has become one of social media's biggest stars of recent times.www.ladbible.com
Fair point, however no defence, in any team, anywhere, has their left back as the one calling out the “step up” etc for the offside line. That is a centre backs jobTo be honest, I thought the line was good, we were just a bit narrow but thats probably more to do with their line-up more than anything else.
He was not bad, not great. His crossing showed how rusty he is.
We won’t really know much until we’re a good few games in with him. He’s recovering from a long-term injury and learning how Beale wants him to operate all at once.
People that have never played football at any sort of level. It was Goldsons fault. End of. Yilmaz got in line and tucked in. He looks more aggressive than Borna. Lovely pass to Fashion second half shows the quality. Our fan base really need to learn to give players time, especially those that haven't played in 5 months.How can people say he got caught out for the first goal when he correctly moved up alongside 2 other defenders ? It was Goldson that played the boy on.
He done ok, nothing special but getting minutes on the park after such a long lay off is exactly what he and the club needs.
Think you need to have another look at it. Goldson is a yard behind everybody else and plays the boy on.To be honest, I thought the line was good, we were just a bit narrow but thats probably more to do with their line-up more than anything else.
I don’t think his crossing is one of his attributes regardless of injuries.
I could end up being completely wrong but he looks like he will be more of a ball playing fullback and will be used to link attacks rather than get in behind all the time.
Don’t understand the amount of negativity towards him on this thread (not a dig at you), I feel folk enjoy moaning
That's exactly what the Turkish football fans on here said. He's aggressive, very good defensively and is an inverted full back that makes runs in behind. His crossing is his area of weakness. He won 4 out of 4 headers yesterday btw.I don’t think his crossing is one of his attributes regardless of injuries.
I could end up being completely wrong but he looks like he will be more of a ball playing fullback and will be used to link attacks rather than get in behind all the time.
Don’t understand the amount of negativity towards him on this thread (not a dig at you), I feel folk enjoy moaning
154 SPFL minutes and you’re on FF greeting about him.I haven’t called anything
All ive said is he’s not for me just my opinion
he hasn’t settled well, he hasn’t impressed me when he’s had game time, he doesn’t look suited to scottish football or Rangers
As i said happy to be proved wrong
I dont know why some people get so worked up over an opinion it’s not like I said he was shite or slated him
Grow up
Guy’s not completed 90 minutes in the league yet.Thus far it appears a colossal waste of money
He has many times.Borna put in that performance he’d be slaughtered
He's a yard behind the other 3 mate, look at the cut of the grass. No doubt at all he's the most culpable there.Goldson taking a bit of a battering here to defend Ridvan. I don’t think Goldson’s positioning is horrendous in truth, had he been leaning forwards rather than backwards they’d have given offside. I did think Ridvan could have been wider (looks like he’d drifted in because Davies was too far away from his man) but I’m far from convinced he’d have got to the winger anyway.
He’s leaning back - as they all are - because they are starting to turn knowing the ball is coming. All 4 have stepped up and been done by the ball in behind. Would Ridvan being positioned wider have prevented/intercepted the pass? Quite possibly. I’d say both he and Davies are a little ‘lost’ in no man’s land in all honesty, despite the fact it’s Goldson’s back that ultimately is deemed to play the guy onside. Put it this way, when that pass was played I wasn’t shouting ‘FFS Goldson’. Were you?He's a yard behind the other 3 mate, look at the cut of the grass. No doubt at all he's the most culpable there.
Surely you aren’t saying, the one guy outta the four that isn’t in line, isn’t to blame?Goldson taking a bit of a battering here to defend Ridvan. I don’t think Goldson’s positioning is horrendous in truth, had he been leaning forwards rather than backwards they’d have given offside. I did think Ridvan could have been wider (looks like he’d drifted in because Davies was too far away from his man) but I’m far from convinced he’d have got to the winger anyway.
I was when I saw the replay and he'd played the guy on because he was the only one who wasn't in line?He’s leaning back - as they all are - because they are starting to turn knowing the ball is coming. All 4 have stepped up and been done by the ball in behind. Would Ridvan being positioned wider have prevented/intercepted the pass? Quite possibly. I’d say both he and Davies are a little ‘lost’ in no man’s land in all honesty, despite the fact it’s Goldson’s back that ultimately is deemed to play the guy onside. Put it this way, when that pass was played I wasn’t shouting ‘FFS Goldson’. Were you?
Agreed. He got caught underneath one yesterday.Because of his height most teams will play the long diagonal into his area.
Reinforces my point does it not.Guy’s not completed 90 minutes in the league yet.
‘Colossal waste of money’
Try telling that to some of the maniacs in here that have written him off after about 160 minutes worth of football.I’ll not comment on his ability to play football as to do so at this stage would be mental.
His height concerns me as up here, teams will stick a 6ft plus striker on him and use as an outball. We might see him getting played further up the park in future.