This is a case of toys out of the pram by the OP.
Rambling personal attacks that will only damage the cause of fan ownership, and for what? To make himself feel better because he didn't get his own way. Didn't like women standing up to him.
Disagreements happen and it's a shame he is ill and feels unable to continue, but that is no excuse for such a petty, mean spirited and destructive post.
Giving a one sided account of private conversations is a shoddy thing to do.
He should be ashamed of himself.
I hope he gets wsell soon.
At least we know who the OP is (or we can identify him easily) and he gave a full account of what his issues were. Who are you I wonder?
You've joined yesterday for the sole purpose of posting on this board and all you've contributed is a personal attack. And since you seem to have intimate knowledge/opinions of certain events:
1- "Didn't like women standing up to him" ... Why would you jump to that conclusion? That's not the impression I got from reading his post. Far from it. Sounds more like a personal opinion that someone holds who knows him would make because they think it's true or to play the sex card to defend themselves.
2- "one sided account of private conversations" ... Nothing in his post alludes to private conversations so why would you say that unless you know something we don't? Unless you're refering to his conversation with Euan McFarlane? And there's nothing "shoddy" about revealing that unless you are Euan himself or someone involved right?
You accuse the OP of rambling personal attacks and that he should be ashamed of himself, yet you join up just to attack him in a shameful manner. Bizarre.
So, excuse me for feeling that you are personally involved in this and the fact that you haven't even attempted to answer the OP's clear accusations against the individuals (you?), instead preferring to resort to attacking his character and honesty stinks of someone on the defensive. Why would that be?
Now I'm a complete neutral in all of this except of course wanting the best for the club as every average fan does. But two things really jumped out of this post to me and many others. 1. Chris Graham being paid to advise C1872. A strange set up don't you think? & 2. the OP being prevented from putting forward valid and crucial opinions of fans and members to the Rangers board ... by none other than a fellow director? If this is so, then perhaps some people need reminded exactly who's money and shares they are responsible for. Wouldn't you agree? It appears not, as none of this seems to concern you? Only character assassination seems to be your goal. Why?
And if, as I suspect, you are indeed one of the people involved, then the fact that your imagination can't stretch further than the meal on the plate under your nose when trying to come up with a 'Rangers themed' username, tells me everything I need to know about the calibre of individual who is 'running' the organisation. By the way, does anyone know if Laura, Joanne or Euan are vegetarian? Just a thought ....
We need more high calibre and hard working candidates to complement the existing directors in future.
Not replace them, no? Is that not an option? Hmmm... I rest my case.