I don't think it's worth going into the specifics from the OP or the likes, for reasons already mentioned.
I do think it's worth trying to gain an understanding of what people want Club1872 to represent, though. In many ways, the aims of the groups that merged were somewhat different.
Those who say we need something of a culture change for this to work are correct. It's uncharted territory for us, and mistakes are inevitable. I'm not suggesting we ignore them, but more that we learn as a support and move things forward rather than burning it down and starting again.
Here's one question I'd ask - is there anyone among the support, who is able to do the job Chris Graham does, that every fan would back?
I do think it's worth trying to gain an understanding of what people want Club1872 to represent, though. In many ways, the aims of the groups that merged were somewhat different.
Those who say we need something of a culture change for this to work are correct. It's uncharted territory for us, and mistakes are inevitable. I'm not suggesting we ignore them, but more that we learn as a support and move things forward rather than burning it down and starting again.
Here's one question I'd ask - is there anyone among the support, who is able to do the job Chris Graham does, that every fan would back?