wee bud's pit boots
Well-Known Member
So if the rules are followed it will be a mockery? OK.
It's the fact this mob are allowed to spout their crap all the time that grates.
Sod knows what we'll be subjected to next week?
So if the rules are followed it will be a mockery? OK.
He's already keeping one eye on the situation.
Ignore the rules, the c--ts made up new ones back in 2012, just to make sure we were left lifeless.Ah well, can’t be having the game up here being made to look bad. Best to just ignore the rules to suit one side so as to make sure that their conspiratorial hoards don’t get conspiratorial. So it won’t look bad.
That’s a good shout, has this been done before?It'll be something like a 3 game ban with 2 games suspended, so he only misses being on the touchline this weekend.
If it was any other set of fixtures on the horizon, he'd be missing 2 games minimum.
Either their expensive KC has spotted a loophole or he's hoping to bamboozle the panel with the meaning of incompetent. I wonder if they are putting forward evidence from other (former) refs as to the accuracy of the decisions.
I can see another ref strike if he's found not proven
Lawyers.
How can he possibly be found not proven mate???
It was live on TV when he contravened the rules by insulting a match official
According to the herald the outcome will be announced at some point after 3What times the hearing?
He will get banned ..Kettlewell got a 3 game ban for saying the same stuff earlier this season ..so what's the difference
They are not beyond making a mockery of themselves in fact they are actually pretty good at it,in a way I would love them to let Rodgers away with it .They can bring in all the lawyers that they want but the fact of the matter is that he used the exact words that the specific rule prohibits the use of.
They have no leg to stand on.
In fact, if anything other than a 2 match ban is handed out, that would be making a mockery of the SFA/SPFL, for the second time this season by that club.
Peter Grant may sound like he is drunk, mad or both, but in a funny way he reflects the likely thinking of the decision makers here.
I would mind if he does escape a ban. A lot! If he does, then the game truly is a bogey.Equally although he deserves it I dont mind him escaping to be on the touchline, provided we beat them and teach him a lesson.
If you were a cynical sort, you may think the reason for taking so long to hold the hearing was to figure out an explanation which would negate a ban.If the SFA don't ban him, then their going to have to explain it, and the only explanation could be "Sellick told us no tae ban him".
They can bring in all the lawyers that they want but the fact of the matter is that he used the exact words that the specific rule prohibits the use of.
They have no leg to stand on.
In fact, if anything other than a 2 match ban is handed out, that would be making a mockery of the SFA/SPFL, for the second time this season by that club.
Well, maybe...apart from the fact that the SFAs rules for such hearings dictate that the 'accused' has to have 14 days in order to prepare their case. Which took us into the middle of last week's international 'jollies' - hence the delay to this week. It's not a Fast Track hearing like you get for a red card for a player.If you were a cynical sort, you may think the reason for taking so long to hold the hearing was to figure out an explanation which would negate a ban.
We shall see.
Called it. Can see through the SFA all the time. UselessHe faces a 2 game ban
Prediction- 1 game ban, with a further suspended. Convenient.
A full quashing would make the officials walk out here
It was loud and clear to everybody. but who will play it by the official rules, possibly those well-known neutral refs Ben Doone or Pat Magroine would suitSorry for the caps. HE SAID THEY WERE INCOMPETENT IN THREE DISPARATE MEDIA INTERVIEWS.
The rules state you can not claim incompetence or bias.
If he isn’t bang to rights the game is a bowl of soup.
Called it. Can see through the SFA all the time. Useless
Shocking,but expected.2 Match ban........................................1 suspended