Whether you want him or not, it's also a bit of a slap in the face to McInnes as well.Thats all well and good. But just how long do you give it?
Once again, it is reflecting poorly on the board, sadly.Whether you want him or not, it's also a bit of a slap in the face to McInnes as well.
Whether you want him or not, it's also a bit of a slap in the face to McInnes as well.
Rodger Hannah said he is still no 1 target but board wont rush anything incase someone they didnt expect to apply does.
Whether you want him or not, it's also a bit of a slap in the face to McInnes as well.
If true then that about sums it up perfectly.Sounds like McInnes is the boards number 1 back up.
If the board really wanted him they would have had him 2 weeks ago.
Once again, it is reflecting poorly on the board, sadly.
Rodger Hannah said he is still no 1 target but board wont rush anything incase someone they didnt expect to apply does.
Probably made up sh1t again but thats what he said.
A view I can sympathise with.IF this is the case then it smacks of, McInnes "will have to do" but we're not convinced so will wait a bit and hopefully something better will come up.
That's where I am on this mate.A view I can sympathise with.
McInnes is not who I want as Rangers manager. The problem is I have been underwhelmed with any of the alternatives so far mentioned.
Hopefully the board will pull a rabbit out of the hat and surprise as all.
I’ll admire King and co for all time for getting the club back, but day-to-day running seems beyond them.
Rodger Hannah said he is still no 1 target but board wont rush anything incase someone they didnt expect to apply does.
Probably made up sh1t again but thats what he said.
Would anybody really be surprised if we had actually been in some form of discussion with McInnes and/or Stewart Milne recently and it is being kept well under wraps? I wouldn't.
This move (if it happens) has a major effect on the sheep so it would make sense for both clubs to have all their ducks in a row prior to any announcement that we have asked formally to speak to the Aberdeen manager (they have to get one in place also remember). Once the formal approach is made it could all happen very quickly.
The above might not be the case but it would hardly be a shock if it was.
Roger 'Celtic are great' Hannah knows fuck all.
Calm doon ffs, it's more dreadful reporting, no more.
They could and should have appointed him before, eventually got rid of the previous Manager but left a vaccuum by not being clear as to what was going on. No-one expects names but it all feels disjointed. Eventually we got a statement that felt like they had to put it out and there appears little clarity over their timeline, let alone clear direction as to the way forward. People don’t really know the brief of the Director of Football and the extent of his involvement in the process. What if the preferred candidate turns out someone who doesn’t want to work under a DoF? We talk of a structure but there appears not to be one.Why?
.