Coatbridge Chancellor
Well-Known Member
That was an interesting one.
Jack for Arfield, fine. Jack was done in.
But that change is inexcusable imo.
Jack for Arfield, fine. Jack was done in.
But that change is inexcusable imo.
Ramsay was visibly Knackered to be fair.
Game was done soon as that sub was made.That was an interesting one.
Jack for Arfield, fine. Jack was done in.
But that change is inexcusable imo.
He was but was still far far better than Aribo.Ramsay was visibly Knackered to be fair.
Ramsay was visibly Knackered to be fair.
I voted Ramsey our MOTM. Amazed Aribo stayed on.That was an interesting one.
Jack for Arfield, fine. Jack was done in.
But that change is inexcusable imo.
We controlled the possession better because we tried to push futher up the field nothing to do with Ramsey departing. If we had employed this with Ramsey on I think he would have had more hope of scoring or creating.Bringing him off was absolutely the correct decision.
We controlled the midfield much better without him, but we’re toothless up top.
We controlled the possession better because we tried to push futher up the field nothing to do with Ramsey departing. If we had employed this with Ramsey on I think he would have had more hope of scoring or creating.
BafflingThat was an interesting one.
Jack for Arfield, fine. Jack was done in.
But that change is inexcusable imo.
I would argue a 10% fit Ramsey would have been a bigger threat than aribo todayRamsay was visibly Knackered to be fair.
Totally agree. He was visibly tired before half time and I thought he might not have come back out. Regardless of the decision to keep Aribo on, Ramsey had to come off.Seriously? Ramsay was hanging after 30 mins. Yes he's brilliant when he has time to get in position, but %^*& me, nobody had that time today.
Scattergun thread.
Even knackered Ramsey was still the best player on the park. He was our main threat from midfield. Our only threat infact. The league was on the line, I couldn't give %^*& if he was tired