Don't forget their disallowed goalOr just shut up and enjoy the win?
The failure to send off Cancar allowing them to sub him off, the offside call where the linesman couldn't get his flag up quickly enough when the ball went in.
Roll on VAR coming in.
They didn't have a disallowed goal.Don't forget their disallowed goal
Whistle had already gone long before the ball ended up in the net.Don't forget their disallowed goal
Throw in Colak's mystery booking. The first player to get booked for elbow being at his side
Throw in Colak's mystery booking. The first player to get booked for elbow being at his side
Will be interesting to see what time the games finish when VAR is in use. There is going to be some amount of stoppage throughout the game given the poor decisions being made!
I'd like to see Colak goal, because I thought he was off.
He was on and I mean clearly onI'd like to see Colak goal, because I thought he was off.
If your performance is influenced and impacted by how the press will perceive it, and you, then it is corruption and corruption = cheating.
The offside call was not shocking. From the linesman's view he would only have seen Colak and not the Livvy player, That is why we need VAR.That offside call was fcking shocking. Clearly they're trying to fck us over while they still can
With this kind of stuff, there needs to be a solid, concerted effort to rid Rangers’ live matches of people like Walker. Crocker we can handle because he’s the main guy, but we genuinely don’t need Walkers bias and general shite co-commentary while he’s sitting there hoping and praying Rangers get beat. He offers nothing other that a fully biased slant on the game against Rangers.
That’s not to say that we shouldn’t be subject to a different view, but surely we can be free from having a known Rangers hating, ex-Celtic player doing co-comms on Rangers games when it’s clear and obvious that his views are totally skewed.
He offers noting of any positivity towards us and always tries to proffer a controversial view, most of which aren’t really controversial at all.
The whole thing needs freshened up, the whole Scottish game, from the officiating to the commentary to the viewing experience. That was patently obvious and totally evident to me today.
The replay clearly showed contact. Another error. The game was littered with errors.VAR doesn't give that red card today
Nor does VAR change the many other niggly things that Robertson chose to pull up in one direction, but not in the other
It does give us Colak's goal
FWIW, I thought the Kent penalty claim was outside the box, and having been closer to it that Robertson, there was definitely contact
In my ideal world we'd have a couple of people pouring over all the major decisions in their own TV berth reporting back to the manager at h/t and during the match via the latest hi-tech equipment. (Our very own 4/5th offficials)Is it solely the managers fault though? Don’t we have people at the club who’s job it is to make statements?
These incidents happened in the same week and if Rangers (and this was a job for the board) had, had the will to highlight the outright hypocrisy here Walke's bigotry would have been laid bare for all to see.The media in Scotland is our No 1 enemy. Nothing will change till Rangers PROVE the bias. That means we need to employ a professional researcher to gather and present comprehensive, undisputable evidence of the bias, double standards and lies. Im talking about academic standard longitudinal studies.
This information would make a blockbuster book bought by tens of thousands of bears. It would more than pay for itself if its done right and it might just change the narrative here in Scotland.
As a small example look at Walker's outrage over the song sung against Steve Clarke. And yet the same song sung at Kris Boyd was somehow enjoyed by Kris.
The offside call was not shocking. From the linesman's view he would only have seen Colak and not the Livvy player, That is why we need VAR.
Or just shut up and enjoy the win?
The failure to send off Cancar allowing them to sub him off, the offside call where the linesman couldn't get his flag up quickly enough when the ball went in.
Roll on VAR coming in.
We're absolutely on the same page bud regards the media.My point is really about media bias here in Scotland. Ok the ref "cheated". The question is why?
I know, I was closer to it that Robertson wasThe replay clearly showed contact. Another error. The game was littered with errors.
I agree that Sands has played his way into the team but ffs give Souttar a chance at least. He's been here 5 minutes.I knew he (Souttar) wouldn't work out and can't wait for Davies to be fit. Play young Sands until then.
Welcome to the party Derta. This is just continuing from 2012. We are referreed to a very different standard from every other team in Scotland.I dont usually get involved in ref beating. However on this occasion i did say to my bil that is simply chrating by the official. He is not showing the second yellow to allow him to be subbed. That is not in his hands to make that decision, so he simply cheated. He did not make an error he cheated.
Martindale has just confirmed his player should have been shown a second yellow.
Exactly what I said to my brother after the game. Plus that prick of a linesman is behind play with a livy defender blocking his view of Colak, so why did he flag ? Delighted with the 3pts but it could have cost us .That game would have been entirely different if Livvy were down to 10 men in that first half. It was a clear second yellow card offence by Cancar. Robertson is a cheat, and showed it again today.
another problem is Sky, their biased commentary team and what replay's they show. They could easily have shown it from another angle however the silence from walker when the single replay from a crap angle was shown usually lets you know.I know, I was closer to it that Robertson was
I'm saying I thought it was outside the box