Im all for "innocent until proven guilty" etc, but in this instance, for the charges he got off with, it was literally a slam dunk conviction - the evidence was so strong, "guilty" was a formality.
Where am i going with this ?
The guy WASNT found innocent - he avoided trial, so, surely he should be tagged, or have some restriction order put in place.
After all, if he isnt medically up for a trial, surely going out and about, driving, going to the shops etc would also be beyond his ability, so it would make no diference to him........