Grigo Yossarian
Well-Known Member
Record archives bud, from memory 'm sure they had a pic of him arriving or leaving court?
Found a BBC & two Scotsman articles. No pictures
Record archives bud, from memory 'm sure they had a pic of him arriving or leaving court?
Typical, a photographer without pictures of himself, you think he had something to hide Grigo.Found a BBC & two Scotsman articles. No pictures
thanks for the names of the convicted, I have managed to get photos of all bar 1, John Cullen. Anyone got access to his mugshot?
There is an image if you search John Cullen Celtic but not 100% sure it is him.
I would err on the side of caution .....
Go to Google. You'll find photo's there mate
Not of his face certainly.There isn't one.
For a photographer he sure wasn't into selfies.
Wrong. No win no fee is not that simple. If Thompson's get a win with LBA then fine. But they cant. And they really can't. Thats when someone has to fund the court actions.Thompson's will be doing this on a no win no fee basis. The victims won't be out of pocket.
I am sure i seen this on tv in the 90s no doubt the footage be destroyed by now
Wrong. No win no fee is not that simple. If Thompson's get a win with LBA then fine. But they cant. And they really can't. Thats when someone has to fund the court actions.
Because they cant get ATE!!! No disrespect mate but please get to know hiw this stuff works before posting.Of course Thompson's want as many victims as possible to come forward.
But I know of no good reason why they haven't started serving the writs given they'been threatening to do so for some time.
Ok then you explain how it all works for us thickos on here.Because they cant get ATE!!! No disrespect mate but please get to know hiw this stuff works before posting.
It has to be proven regardless.
Ok then you explain how it all works for us thickos on here.
Ok then you explain how it all works for us thickos on here.
No one is thick. You need after the event ATE insurance in case you lose the case. Thompsons don't provide that. This is what i do. No ATE no going to court. If you cant afford the courts costs you arent going to court. Thats why the big guys always win. They can afford court costs. Sad immoral but fact
LBA is letter before actionHe's too busy showing off with his LBA's and ATE's to explain it.
What I know for a fact, is that victims have been assured they won't be a penny out of pocket should this go belly-up!
Is there any truth in the rumour they are heading to court in the US 29th July after losing an appeal in the Supreme Court.Tried to head it off by claiming to be a British company exempt from US law.Just a text I was sent.
Glad it’s not just me who remembers this. I’m sure it was a documentary and they spoke to Charlie Nicholas and Lou Macari. They all said it was common knowledge. I can’t find anything related to this documentary but I’m positive it exists.
Don't think the victims have anything to be concerned about given those accused are now in prison and found guilty,I would also imagine most of these no win no fee places would only take cases on where they have evidence and pretty confient of winning the case.No one is thick. You need after the event ATE insurance in case you lose the case. Thompsons don't provide that. This is what i do. No ATE no going to court. If you cant afford the courts costs you arent going to court. Thats why the big guys always win. They can afford court costs. Sad immoral but fact
Fingers crossed there is.Time they were shown up for the scum they are.Probably none whatsoever.
Wrong. No win no fee is not that simple. If Thompson's get a win with LBA then fine. But they cant. And they really can't. Thats when someone has to fund the court actions.
New York State has a Supreme Court at state level, don’t confuse federal Supreme Court and the state level, I still doubt the story but they are both different jurisdictions and NY state law is a bastard to deal with for what it’s worth.It's bullshit as I expected mate.
I'll try get a genuine update tonight and report back what I can.
Glad it’s not just me who remembers this. I’m sure it was a documentary and they spoke to Charlie Nicholas and Lou Macari. They all said it was common knowledge. I can’t find anything related to this documentary but I’m positive it exists.
https://theukdatabase.com/2012/04/04/john-cullen-pollokshaws/He won't.
There are no photo's of him anywhere.
Can you explain this to me in layman's terms? Why can't Thompson's win with an LBA?
Also, can some other individual or independent body fund the court actions?
New York State has a Supreme Court at state level, don’t confuse federal Supreme Court and the state level, I still doubt the story but they are both different jurisdictions and NY state law is a bastard to deal with for what it’s worth.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Supreme_Court
LBA is letter before action
ATE is after the event. Its insurance cover. Its a very high risk policy that underwriters take a view on.
No one is showing off. Its commercial. And thats why Thompsons havent gone to court i think. They cant afford it and nor can their clients.
As Cullen has a conviction then the police files at the time would have a photo of him, surely that could be acquired by Thompsons solicitors in their efforts of trying to prove a case that there was numerous amounts of perverts operating at the club.Every defendant with funds ( CFC in this case) will simply defend a letter before action. Can you afford to take me to court? If no then you need ATE. But if the underwriter thinks your chances of winning are slim or unknown then the premiums are unaffordable. Its just like going to the bookies. Believe me, the small man rarely wins these cases. Now, if Rangers fans want to pay through crowd funding for Thompsons ATE then thats a horse of a different colour.
the parts of the story we do know is the offences were committed in Kearny NJ and the deal was cut in boston MA . im sure thats correct.
I was thinking about crowd funding as you posted that. I'd donate to help raise the moneyEvery defendant with funds ( CFC in this case) will simply defend a letter before action. Can you afford to take me to court? If no then you need ATE. But if the underwriter thinks your chances of winning are slim or unknown then the premiums are unaffordable. Its just like going to the bookies. Believe me, the small man rarely wins these cases. Now, if Rangers fans want to pay through crowd funding for Thompsons ATE then thats a horse of a different colour.
Well done on both counts pal, I wish more, myself included, would follow.I’ve also got other emails that I have sent to various sponsors. Only Mr green have replied with a standard email.
I’ve took advice on whether to post the last post and I decided to do so after taking advice from someone who I respect that has fought for justice from the start.
I’ve also had posters private messaging me asking for my advice and direction on who to email or contact.
Maybe some of you disagree with the wording or even posting emails without a reply.
I’m proud of knowing the people that I’ve met that are involved with knowing the families that have suffered and the path of coverup that club has taken.
So I’m sticking my neck out here probably. I want justice and that poison of a club brought to its knees. I can post so much more and I’ve kept it to myself.
But Humza done it for me today with his comments about sectarianism and not tackling what the real problem is.
I would also like to say and believe me I’ve tried contacting him on many occasions. I would like to sit across a table with Humza and ask why as a justice secretary of Scotland that he has not taken the appropriate action necessary against Celtic. Or any SNP Member of parliament in that matter. I challenge you and not for an argument but to please explain why you take the stance that you do?
Your party allow a pro IRA organisation to march on our streets in Scotland and nowhere else in the British mainland is this allowed. The call it out scum I’m referring to.
As an ex member of the armed forces that has served I would like to know why you allow this? Obviously for votes imo.
#ScottishNonceProtection.I'm not on twitter. Don't understand it.
But this hashtag thing, what exactly is it?
Would it not be better to attack the SNatsiParty? For instance:
#SNP-ProtectingPeadophiles
#SNP-YESTOcondoningPeadophilia
So Andrew are you therefore concerned that this might never go to court no matter the evidence secured by the victims & their support team ?
The 20 working days are up for the response expected from Humzas office so an email will be winging its way to his office first thing tomorrow asking why this has happened and also to point out i wont be ignored nor will this issue disappear. My local MSP will also be getting an email to ask about the governments stats on response rates to queries from members of the public.
A drop in the ocean GG but there are many doing much more but hopefully as a collective we can get real justice for the victimsExcellent work sir. Cap doffed.
So Andrew are you therefore concerned that this might never go to court no matter the evidence secured by the victims & their support team ?
Read a big article on this on Twitter earlier and it appears to be genuine. Celtic appealed on the grounds that they are a British company but the Supreme Court dismissed their appeal. It appears that Lawwell also screwed up by not declaring through AIM that he had hired an independent lawyer to carry out the 2 year investigation. This should have been declared under Companies Regulations. This was on TwitterIs there any truth in the rumour they are heading to court in the US 29th July after losing an appeal in the Supreme Court.Tried to head it off by claiming to be a British company exempt from US law.Just a text I was sent.
The 20 working days are up for the response expected from Humzas office so an email will be winging its way to his office first thing tomorrow asking why this has happened and also to point out i wont be ignored nor will this issue disappear. My local MSP will also be getting an email to ask about the governments stats on response rates to queries from members of the public.
LBA is letter before action
ATE is after the event. Its insurance cover. Its a very high risk policy that underwriters take a view on.
No one is showing off. Its commercial. And thats why Thompsons havent gone to court i think. They cant afford it and nor can their clients.