Southseager
Well-Known Member
I've written to BBC in England asking for them to look at this impartially
Definitely the biggest and strongest action we as fans can take, but do we have the bottle to put our money where our mouth is?
They can’t fine you if you don’t use the service.This is the question.
I would be up for a boycott of fee but would they not just fine you for not paying and make their money that way?
People will be scared to stop paying a fee that is legal and they could cost them a lot of money.
Any kind of boycott of fee would need to be organised by people who would get most on board. The Club can’t call for this but maybe club1872 could?
If the club and you bridle at "perceived inaction" then fill the communications vacuum, it's really very simple, Raffles. Tell us what's going on or our perceptions are based on results.
IMO this is the club telling us what’s been going on.
My point was that people who expect instant reactions from the club to every issue we face should be reassured by this interview that the club are fighting our corner albeit in private.
I thought I’d made that pretty clear.
If we don't get our message out there, our enemies are emoboldened and the attacks increase which is what's been allowed to happen by our unacceptable approach.
The club have clearly been working behind the scenes and now have decided that this is the best time to get our message out there.
Anyway, this is a decent start. I would have liked him to expand on what we could do, gave it a big build up then it fizzled out. What, specifically can the bears do?
Good question. There are some great suggestions on this thread already. I’d definitely be interested in some sort of march on pacific quay
Not quite understanding this.They can’t fine you if you don’t use the service.
I,d say we shouldn,t bother negotiating at all with them.they are in the wrong we are not.It's true they are NOW telling us SOME of what has been going on. Personally I'm not reassured by our negotiating for three? years. I'd say we need new negotiators.
Make it public, what would we lose?
JT has his faults like everybody else , and would probably admit he was undeniably wrong saying our fans deserved a battering in Spain which was a very poor and callous comment, moving on to this interview I think this is bang on and very eloquently put together by traynor and nails bbc Scotland "This is the biggest club in the country " was pretty goodWe're fighting back.
I don't like JT but that was an excellent interview and he's 100% correct
You should draw on all your media experience and sort this out.I don't think he actually puts the examples across as well as it could have been but at the same time it's still good it's out there.
You should draw on all your media experience and sort this out.
A politician who doesn’t know the difference between hear and here and people vote for that to represent them. And that’s before we get to his terrorist sympathising.
I am stunned the English high heid yins haven't stepped in.
Gerrard is the biggest thing in Scotch football since Souness, and the BBC have no access to him.
The club should be commended, some would have folded by now but the club have and will stand there ground.
You should write to tell them just incase Jim Traynor doesn’t know which parts of the BBC has control over which parts.Saying this impasse from BBC Scotland will take years to get sorted is wrong. The Club should be taking this higher and go to the BBC Board of Governors. BBC Scotland management are not fit for purpose.
Because it was an interview with Traynor they botched.Why didn’t Stuart Robertson give that interview to Club1872? It would have carried a lot more weight and the BBC wouldn’t be able to ignore it.
It sounds to me that was just a wee jab , theres a haymaker comingis it just me or are the gloves finally off?
I wish I was back there to stop paying them.If I can put it into perspective , even if just 10,000 bears in Scotland cancel their tv license , that’s over £120,000 a month or over £1.4 million a year if you prefer .
That’s a LOT of money for Pacific Quay FC to lose .
And I reckon we could easily double that figure as we are not talking about season ticket holders necessarily , just regular people who are Rangers fans sick fed up with our treatment by bbc Scotland .
Questions would be rapidly asked by the big bosses down south if Pacific Quay start suddenly seeing a drastic drop in their Scottish demographic not paying the fee .
Got a feeling this could well be the answer - it’s the only thing these cretins understand .
I had to fix that alcohol Scotch thing we are Scottish, everything else I agree with.I am stunned the English high heid yins haven't stepped in.
Gerrard is the biggest thing in Scottish football since Souness, and the BBC have no access to him.
The club should be commended, some would have folded by now but the club have and will stand there ground.
Don't let them in to your house and ask them to leave your property,once you let them in your house and they see your telly your'e fecked!!...I can assure you they won't take you to court as it costs too much to do that, also they can't prove you have a telly,I now haven't been paying for 3 years,I have had had I think 4/5 Sherriffs officers calling and I have told them to get to feck,I have had umpteen threating letters, they get shredded and put in the recycle binAnyone got the link Club1872 issues to complain ? i stopped paying my tv license and just got a letter saying they will be sending an officer
Same here as he used to be part of the problem.Don't disagree with anything he's saying but I still can't wrap my head around him working for us.