LizzyDrippin
Well-Known Member
Watch them and the Jolly Bhoys Outing lobby on here demand a return to the old allocation.
Two mentally challenged barriers will probably be set up running from the wee car park across the road to the turnstiles at the Govan/Broomloan.Any guesses as to how segregation outside the game would work?
Hope doesn't go back to them having Edmiston Road to themselves.
i know , they'll come in through barriers and that'll be thatNo think you know that mate.
Do mix freely with most European fans, yeah.
No it absolutely shouldn’t be gold only.Should be gold only
i was against the initial change and also against it reverting to them getting the whole Broomloan ....... i think the 5% euro allocation is the middle ground " sensible " decisionThere’s never a bigger picture with the support - it’s all about the individual.
Who cares that a ST holder is now negatively impacted when they get a ticket to Parkhead?
There were some highly critical of Bisgrove. Not today, though, because despite shafting ST holders, they’ve got a ticket for Parkhead.
From where where will there busses be and how do they get there?i know , they'll come in through barriers and that'll be that
It should not be difficult for Rangers to confirm we have 5% (3000) and what that looks like on the Parkhead stadium footprint.If this is true, the board have let our support down.
How's it a win win when some ST holders are losing out?It’s not been the same the fixture needs it and makes it more appealing to TV companies too.
Now also a better chance of going to Parkhead too win win
Not in my opinion.
The club have finally grown up instead of petty bollocks. The initial reduction was based on a random fan doing a survey online that anyone could fill in. The reality was because we were getting regularly beaten.
Both clubs finally grown up and came to a good agreement that many fans wanted, despite the noise of a lot on here.
Nothing reported says 5% minus segregation.
The full Broomloan will never return.You're absolutely having yourself on, if you think that they're satisfied with this new agreement.
They'll push for the full Broomloan back, using the same channels they've just used to get this new set up in place and by the looks of it, we'll accept it and play along.
I didn't agree with the drastic cutting of the allocation to begin with. But I also understood that the club had to have the balls to stand behind their decision.
The folk shouting for a bigger away allocation should have been asked to offer jo their seats for home games.
as long as Rangers have 46,000 ST holders that can never happenYou're absolutely having yourself on, if you think that they're satisfied with this new agreement.
They'll push for the full Broomloan back, using the same channels they've just used to get this new set up in place and by the looks of it, we'll accept it and play along.
I didn't agree with the drastic cutting of the allocation to begin with. But I also understood that the club had to have the balls to stand behind their decision.
I'm the same mate. In BR4. Moved there so I could take my boys to the family stand and have 3 tickets together. All of us silver MYGERS. Gutted.Scandalous
easily ..... due to work i only make 50% roughly of Ibrox games ( can be 45 or 55% of games ) .........The folk shouting for a bigger away allocation should have been asked to offer jo their seats for home games.
I'm sure they would change their time if it affected them in this way.
They'll no doubt continue bumping their gums about it, but they can't force or demand anything. They had that full stand for years, simply because for countless decades before that, they got that end of the ground. Same with us at the Piggery. It was tradition as much as anything else, that continued after stadium redevelopment. Fortunately common sense finally prevailed and there's no way we're going back to giving them 15% of the stadium and neither they nor anyone else can force us to.This allocation is just a starting point for them, they’ll be back forcing the full allocation before long citing some spurious reasoning, kicking up %^*& with the help of their media pals and we’ll bend. Sure as all hell.
bronze shouldn’t have a look in at all and if anything it should be the higher percentage of silver. But for me Cat A games should always be gold and mygers needs an overhaul anyway.I’m in the same boat but I don’t think it should be just gold. 75% gold, 20% silver and 5% bronze, all ST holders. Maybe.
There’s folk who go home and away and aren’t gold.
Well that’s nonsense. Anyone that bought a season ticket in the broomloan after the allocation must have always known there was a chance this day would come. It really is that simple.The folk shouting for a bigger away allocation should have been asked to offer jo their seats for home games.
I'm sure they would change their time if it affected them in this way.
The full Broomloan will never return.
Euro allocation was a fair compromise which accommodates our away fans too
Not sure if you meant to reply to me mate. Doesn't make any sense in relation to the post quoted.easily ..... due to work i only make 50% roughly of Ibrox games ( can be 45 or 55% of games ) .........
but i defo get a parkhead ticket aye ??
You're proving my point well mate.Well that’s nonsense. Anyone that bought a season ticket in the broomloan after the allocation must have always known there was a chance this day would come. It really is that simple.
as long as Rangers have 46,000 ST holders that can never happen
What that you’re talking nonsense?You're proving my point well mate.
They are being given a new seat or keep their seat and getting priority they will be at the game.How's it a win win when some ST holders are losing out?
No that you wouldn't be prepared to give up your home match ticket to accommodate celtc fan.What that you’re talking nonsense?
as long as Rangers have 46,000 ST holders that can never happen
That’s a real shame mate. Chances of you getting 3 tickets together elsewhere with your boys for these games on a first come, first serve basis are nigh on impossible too.I'm the same mate. In BR4. Moved there so I could take my boys to the family stand and have 3 tickets together. All of us silver MYGERS. Gutted.
How many season ticket holders do we have in total?
How many spare seats does that leave on OF days once you take their 5% allocation off?
Ruined my Easter weekend this.
No they shouldn't.They should give them the corner of the Copeland.
Of course it can, Rangers just tell every ST holder in the Broomloan that the scum are getting you're seat and the decision is final.as long as Rangers have 46,000 ST holders that can never happen
That my season ticket is the Copland rangers end and has been for the best part of 20 years and that i sit and always have sat in the rangers end of the support. You buy a ticket for the broomloan you knew this day one would day come, as I said it really is that simple.No that you wouldn't be prepared to give up your home match ticket to accommodate celtc fan.
Prove me wrong!
100% , you said the people who wanted this change should offer their seats to affected fans ......Not sure if you meant to reply to me mate. Doesn't make any sense in relation to the post quoted.
So we are making arrangements to comply with the 5% commitment in full. Don't be surprised when the filth don't do the same in the first game next season. With no opportunity for us to do the same in retaliation.
That's interesting. You got a source for that?This has only happened because Sky have told the SPFL and the clubs it has to happen.
Am I right in saying that these are the European away allocations?
If so, the scum have no excuse in not allocating the same areas they do for European games.
Or…Of course it can, Rangers just tell every ST holder in the Broomloan that the scum are getting you're seat and the decision is final.
Celtc are playing the long game and as usual we are trying to "build bridges"!
Might be to do with below facilities, exits etc.When it says 'around 5%', does that mean 5% or not? Could mean a fairly significant difference in real terms numbers.
Can anyone clarify if all affected season ticket holders choose to move rather than stay and not attend games against them, that everyone will be able to move seats?
The 1st come 1st served part of the email isn't clear. Is it a case if your not fast you might not get seats in your preferred area of the stadium but you will still ne able to move somewhere or if your not fast, you might not get moved at all and have to accept a season ticket with no games against them?
@Greg Marshall can you help clear this up please?
because it then impacts on Rangers business model but given we have to offer European clubs 5% its not as if we dont already make such an allocation available ...... there's nothing to stop every Season Ticket holder ticking the box for " every home game "But we have just removed 2 games for current ST holders. The process has begun.
What gives you the confidence that it couldn’t be extended further?