Aye but only after his first two yellow card offences.Listen the Lego eater got booked today. That's a miracle in itself.
Aye but only after his first two yellow card offences.Listen the Lego eater got booked today. That's a miracle in itself.
Was it not established last season that ANYONE can raise and issue with the CO not just that ginger prick on sportscene?
If this was Morelos the usual media placemen would be kicking up a fuss, sportscene would run it on loop until the CO would have to take notice.
They are completely reliant on Edouard and if they miss him for any length of time they’ll be in trouble.
Can anyone highlight things to the CO? I’m sure I read that previously. We should definitely be highlighting this, time to fight them at their own game.
Is it not up to them to get the ref to look at it again in that instance?Expect the usual get out of jail statement when it applies to them. " The ref never mentioned it in his report so no further action can be taken"
Andy Walker described it as "the lightest of touches".
Email sent to the SFA (CSC)
This is the immediate response...
Many thanks for your email. We are currently experiencing a high volume of enquiries.
We will attempt to respond within 72 hours.
Thanks for your patience.
Supporters Centre
It was more a push than a punch, but when it's a shove in the face it's a definite sending off.I can honestly say that I ain't surprised that no action was taken.
It's a red card all day long.
He would have got hammered for that deliberate retaliation and as before it would have been debated and shown again and again slow motion on tv and discussed non stop on talk shows and highlighted in all the newspapers then Catholic Claire would have did her creep act by making him miss games, it's corrupt as fu@k we know it and so do they.we will see if there is a bias or not, clear violent conduct and the sort of thing alfie would be pulled up for
Cheers mate (predictive tried to change that to Cheats, lol, it's on our side)
- will drop a complaint email to that.
C'mon, all non-busy bears, email supporters@scottishfa.co.uk
I draw the Compliance Officer's attention to the player Edouard striking a Kilmarnock player's face during the fixture 9 Aug 20. I call for retrospective action and the appropriate punishment. You should have video evidence,
but if necessary i can supply it.
Good idea BNB. I've just done as you suggested and hope others will follow suit.Cheers mate (predictive tried to change that to Cheats, lol, it's on our side)
- will drop a complaint email to that.
C'mon, all non-busy bears, email supporters@scottishfa.co.uk
I draw the Compliance Officer's attention to the player Edouard striking a Kilmarnock player's face during the fixture 9 Aug 20. I call for retrospective action and the appropriate punishment. You should have video evidence,
but if necessary i can supply it.
It was. Write to Klerr and ask for retrospective action.If it was shown on Sportscene he should be done for this, if not shown well you know the rest
Said when I saw it yesterday if that’s Morelos he gets sent off no question
If this was Morelos the usual media placemen would be kicking up a fuss, sportscene would run it on loop until the CO would have to take notice.
They are completely reliant on Edouard and if they miss him for any length of time they’ll be in trouble.
Can anyone highlight things to the CO? I’m sure I read that previously. We should definitely be highlighting this, time to fight them at their own game.
Shouldn't the penalty have been a red? No attempt to play the ball and denied a goal scoring opportunity.i thought the penalty incident was worthy of a yellow and this one a red, yet zero cards.
Just sent off an email to them all. Hope they work.By trolling through a previous thread here on FF, email addresses people had suggested at the time for this were:
clare.whyte@scottishfa.co.uk
disciplinary@scottishfa.co.uk
compliance.officer@scottishfa.co.uk
Now granted I haven't tried any of them myself, so might be best to stick them all in the email you're sending.
That bit might be a tad difficult.You arecall wating your time.
Any CO investigation in to a Paedodome player must meet the following criteria:
1. Must have been wearing blue at time of alleged offence
2. Opponent must have been wearing green and white hoops
3. Must be sanctioned by Peter Liewell and countersigned by Billy McNeill
4. There must be a p in the day of the week
Someone should start a thread and post any blatant fouls that go their way or against us. Would be pretty fucking eye opening at the end of the season I thinkYou get the blatant decisions but this is the kind of marginal gain they benefit from throughout the season. If that is Morelos he’s most likely red carded at the time, certainly banned retrospectively by the compliant officer following umpteen replays and demand for action on Sportscene.
Booked and subbed,not a great day for himListen the Lego eater got booked today. That's a miracle in itself.
Or if he didn't at the time there would be a massive focus on it in todays mediaSaid when I saw it yesterday if that’s Morelos he gets sent off no question
I don't think it's a case of just anybody complaining theses days, pre compliance officer days anybody could, the mentally challengeds got shagger a ban for something about 10years ago, Think its needs to be brought to the attention of Co by an official media outlet (trial by sportscene) or if the ref feels he missed something in the game.
If this was Morelos the usual media placemen would be kicking up a fuss, sportscene would run it on loop until the CO would have to take notice.
They are completely reliant on Edouard and if they miss him for any length of time they’ll be in trouble.
Can anyone highlight things to the CO? I’m sure I read that previously. We should definitely be highlighting this, time to fight them at their own game.
I know that but it won't stop the orks from complainingNothing can be done about the “penalty “ incident as it was done at the time
They were more interested that the ball was out for a shy before their penalty..... And aye it was... Get it right up you.... LolEdouard should receive a 3 game ban for violent conduct but no doubt CO will ignore it
BBC Scotland highlighted it during their highlights package but panel did not discuss the incident
Pathetic it was not reviewed as it clearly was a controversial incident but another BBC sweep sweep job
Andy walker at the time said there was nothing in it, we all know if Morelos even done half of that he would have been sent off
Exactly my pointThat bit might be a tad difficult.
You arecall wating your time.
Any CO investigation in to a Paedodome player must meet the following criteria:
1. Must have been wearing blue at time of alleged offence
2. Opponent must have been wearing green and white hoops
3. Must be sanctioned by Peter Liewell and countersigned by Billy McNeill
4. There must be a p in the day of the week
That's an obscene suggestion, I would rather they just get off with the offence than drop to their level.Pretend your a Celtic fan and they will properly act on it.
There's so many examples, it's pathetic the hate a guy who has never spoke a word gets, i hope he stays and shuts everyone of them upLike the Motherwell game for example him and Crocker are a fucking disgrace at the best of times.
Yeah, did you see his face?Listen the Lego eater got booked today. That's a miracle in itself.
This one doesn't work.By trolling through a previous thread here on FF, email addresses people had suggested at the time for this were:
clare.whyte@scottishfa.co.uk
disciplinary@scottishfa.co.uk
compliance.officer@scottishfa.co.uk
Now granted I haven't tried any of them myself, so might be best to stick them all in the email you're sending.
As I understood it as Julien had made no attempt to play the ball at the penalty he should have been awarded a yellow card.i thought the penalty incident was worthy of a yellow and this one a red, yet zero cards.
Don't know that it was a clear goalscoring opportunity given the attacker was on the bye line but definitely no attempt to play the ball.Shouldn't the penalty have been a red? No attempt to play the ball and denied a goal scoring opportunity.
Think someone did this last year but it began somewhat retrospectively. Would be good to have it going from the start of the season.Someone should start a thread and post any blatant fouls that go their way or against us. Would be pretty fucking eye opening at the end of the season I think
Thanks for the information - don't blame you at all about the mortgage.The best way would be to write in the following format.
Kilmarnock Vs celtic
9.8.20
61 mins approx
Edouard strikes opponent in face with forearm/hand. Possible violent conduct missed by referee and officials.
I have done contractual work in the past for the SFA so my email might be on record . The mortgage comes first
Why don't get another email address????The best way would be to write in the following format.
Kilmarnock Vs celtic
9.8.20
61 mins approx
Edouard strikes opponent in face with forearm/hand. Possible violent conduct missed by referee and officials.
I have done contractual work in the past for the SFA so my email might be on record . The mortgage comes first
So the modus operandi has been to fill the media with poets or if not then get them on the books then create a position to retroactively mete out punishment that only poets deem punishable. It checks out, I suppose.------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Retrospective Action Necessary
From: #########
Sent: Monday, 10 August 2020 16:15
To: "supporters@scottishfa co. uk" <supporters@scottishfa.co.uk>
CC:
I have subsequently learned that there may be a rule that any potential investigation into an incident is subject to it being highlighted by an official media outlet.
If this is the case, then the condition is met because the incident was shown on BBC Sportscene. I believe the Compliance Officer is duty bound to take action;
make it happen.
------- Original Message --------
Subject: Retrospective Action Necessary
From: ###########
Sent: Monday, 10 August 2020 07:17
To: supporters@scottishfa.co.uk
CC:
I draw the Compliance Officer's attention to the player Edouard striking a Kilmarnock player's face during the fixture 9 Aug 20. I call for retrospective action and the appropriate punishment. You should have video evidence, but if necessary i can supply it.
Option 3 will be impossible unless he pre signed the cheques
She changed it to @celtic.co.ukThis one doesn't work.