Jimmy Jazz
Well-Known Member
Why was the McGregor incident deemed to be deliberate but the Power one wasn't? Because Andy Walker said so?
Yeah that was a blatant assaultIm more surprised the st mirren one wasnt a ban tbh
Why was the McGregor incident deemed to be deliberate but the Power one wasn't? Because Andy Walker said so?
To be honest this isn’t as bad as it seems. Mainly because:
1) he can play against the scum
2) it just further highlights the absolute joke of a system and the bias invoked in it, more ammo for the club to use.
That’s certainly a silver lining but ignores the deeper issue.I'm happy. They've got Celtic next and we need Killie to get a result there imo.
Does the compliance officer have to provide justification for these non citations?
Power & McGinn decisions are an utter fücking disgrace.
I'm not surprised at the decision in isolation, because the whole thing is a farce, but I'm surprised they didn't take this as it's an open goal to try and appear 'balanced'. The fact that they haven't is almost like making a statement.
This is exactly what they are doingThe mentally challenged compliance officer is trolling us now.
Maybe she doesn't have a premier sports sub."Insufficient evidence" apparently...…...farce!! How McGinn got away with it is mindboggling
Im more surprised the st mirren one wasnt a ban tbh
The McGinn Elbow is astonishing.
One of the most dangerous and cowardly tackles you’ll see this season and no red.
The fact he’s been cited when power wasn’t points to cheating.If a straight leg to the face is not a red card then mcgregors straight leg to the leg is a yellow at worst!!
If mcgregor gets a ban then it’s cheating to the highest order and blatant
Good news in all honesty as he's one of Kilmarnock's most effective players. Laughable decision though. Power is clearly going for the ball but even if there was no contact I'd be still looking for a red card. It is dangerous play.
Look, preparing myself for incoming but the rules are if the ref sees it and deals with it, compliance officer can’t do anything unless it’s simulation or mistaken identity. So it’s pretty clear cut with him already having been booked.
The problem is when we don’t know what the referee feels like saying they’ve seen and conveniently forgetting about. We all know how that works out.
In summary, not bitter at this as it’s within the rule but I AM bitter about the rules and the whole scenario.
This .There was no mhedia frenzy to have the Compliance Officer get involved as there always is with us, so no surprise Power got away with it.
Look, preparing myself for incoming but the rules are if the ref sees it and deals with it, compliance officer can’t do anything unless it’s simulation or mistaken identity. So it’s pretty clear cut with him already having been booked.
The problem is when we don’t know what the referee feels like saying they’ve seen and conveniently forgetting about. We all know how that works out.
In summary, not bitter at this as it’s within the rule but I AM bitter about the rules and the whole scenario.
Despite him being yellow carded at the time, the compliance officer offered a 2 game ban, so that blows that out the water.Hibs player?
Despite him being yellow carded at the time, the compliance officer offered a 2 game ban, so that blows that out the water.
So defence exhibit A for shagger is a photo of Powers challenge. Case over. Then again it’s one rule for us.......
Exactly, and the booking wasn't for either mistaken identity or simulation.
You think he'll try against them?I’m not surprised and tbh I’m glad as they’ve got Celtic next haven’t they?