Rio Loyal
Well-Known Member
£500k more than expected. He’s crap
He’s not crap and a full NI international
If we get 500k for him it probably wipes out his signing on fee and most of his wages we paid for him .
£500k more than expected. He’s crap
You gave him a half decent write up there so why settle for £500k?
we got him on a free, Gerrard wants rid of him now, no danger we'll get 3 mil for him no matter how we set the payment up1.5mil we should be asking for nothing less and with a few add ins that could boost it up to 3mil Mark he is an international player and off 3 clubs are in then it's not out with 1 of there budgets
Your bang on the mark.£1 million and we can start talking. Let's face it if 3 clubs are involved one of them will have no problem taking a punt on him at that price.
If he was still under contract at Killie - how much would they have been looking for him??
You’d like to think Ross Wilson would add a sell on clause.Guarantee he goes down there and gets a big move for millions a la Waghorn.
Bloody idiots mate. No wonder that other lot get high prices for their players and we accept chicken feed.So apparently three clubs are competing for him but some posters think that means the price goes down?
Talk about fixed mindset?
I'd happily take 500k and a sell on clause.
Nobody on this forum has any influence on how much we get for our playersBloody idiots mate. No wonder that other lot get high prices for their players and we accept chicken feed.
You'd be surprised. It's a public forumNobody on this forum has any influence on how much we get for our players
Frankly if you have 3 championship teams interested in him the fee of £1.5m should not be excessive. He is an international and in his mid twenties. Will Griggs went to Sunderland ,in a lower division , last season for around £4 m. He is also older ,we should not under sell our players.
Highly doubtful for a player who essentially relys on his pace with no end product.
Jones is a very limited player and anything we get for him is a bonus.
Poor player.
£500k more than expected. He’s crap
Gerrard has subsequently contradicted that, which may or may not be a seller’s tactic.Shot ourselves in the foot a little by stating that he’s not wanted and can leave at the first opportunity. Hardly builds value when clubs are looking at him.
1.5mil we should be asking for nothing less and with a few add ins that could boost it up to 3mil Mark he is an international player and off 3 clubs are in then it's not out with 1 of there budgets
Listening to the mentally challengeds talking up their players value constantly hasn't done them any harm, if it's put out as a general consensus by the fan base the mouthpieces in the press run with what's being said.Nobody on this forum has any influence on how much we get for our players
Arsenal never paid £25m for Tierney because of what Paul from Coatbridge and Keith Jackson in the Record said he is worth £25m. They paid it because their recruitment team believed he was worth it.Listening to the mentally challengeds talking up their players value constantly hasn't done them any harm, if it's put out as a general consensus by the fan base the mouthpieces in the press run with what's being said.
You look at negative issues I will look at the fact he is an international who before his injury against the mentally challengeds was playing well but has fell out with the manager nothing to do with his ability what don't you go kerrydale street and purr how good there players areThere’s always one!
How likely do you think it is that clubs will agree to pay £1.5m for a guy we picked up for nothing a year ago, has barely played and now been deemed surplus to requirements?
On the contrary £1.5m for a full international not yet at his peak is a bargain and is the minimum we should be looking for .Nobody is paying that for Jones
No we didn’t we got him on freedom of contract an entirely different thing How much would Kilmarnock have wanted if he had been under contract ?we got him on a free, Gerrard wants rid of him now, no danger we'll get 3 mil for him no matter how we set the payment up
Explain the difference between a free and freedom of contract?No we didn’t we got him on freedom of contract an entirely different thing How much would Kilmarnock have wanted if he had been under contract ?
Explain the difference between a free and freedom of contract?
Semantic Sunday.
[/QUOTE
he turned down a contract offer from his club
He was not freed as in surplus to requirement/ not good enough
We freed Flanagan Halliday Holt for example as they weren’t of the standard required not offered a new deal
You look at negative issues I will look at the fact he is an international who before his injury against the mentally challengeds was playing well but has fell out with the manager nothing to do with his ability what don't you go kerrydale street and purr how good there players are