Oh, this is much bigger than that!They've made a complete arse of this, but got there eventually.
This panel system must be ditched and replaced by drunks and maniacs.One panel member said it hadn’t seen all the evidence.
Why not?
Why has this person now been removed from the list?
It's the wee woman that works in Gregg's and the Romanian guy that plays the fiddle.I’m sure I heard that two of the three on the panel were “non football people”. What is that all about?
I haven't had much dealing with lawyers in my life - but, lawyers seem to generate work for lawyers............
The game was so much simpler before lawyers got involved..................
Sums up Scottish football actuallyThe truth is if it happened to us, we would be in uproar, whilst everyone else laughs. When t happens to a club without the hatred then everyone finally sees sense.
I haven't had much dealing with lawyers in my life - but, lawyers seem to generate work for lawyers............
The game was so much simpler before lawyers got involved..................
looks like they have sold a panel member down the river to save face.
Is this the same tribunal that found us guilty Re Alfie, and Kent's gesture last week? I know we have appealed that one again.Tribunal 'cannot be deemed competant' and the ruling 'cannot be deemed valid'.
Only telling us what we already know about these halfwits.
I don't think it's necessarily that the correct process wasn't followed. It's more that the process itself is seriously flawed.Wonder how many other times the correct process hasn’t been followed? Absolute joke of an organisation
Wonder how many other times the correct process hasn’t been followed? Absolute joke of an organisation
A panel member has been thrown to the lions here. What about the other two?
They always have been, a total farce.They are making it up as they go along
A very odd statement considering anybody simply had to watch a single replay to see it was an obvious foul. What evidence did that panel member actually see?One panel member said it hadn’t seen all the evidence
Supposed to be yes, but quite clearly they are not.Are they not supposed to be independent?
It was a clearly incorrect decision originally and not to overturn it but I wonder if all this fuss would have been made by the media if it was Alfie on the wrong end of that.
So, they claim a panel member didn’t consider ‘ALL’ the evidence? That’s just lies. It’s not up to the panel to find their own evidence, they make their judgement based upon the evidence the SFA supplies them with. Their claim just doesn’t stack up at all.
In fairness to the player, it was never a second yellow/red card.
Stevie wonder & Ray Charles?I’m sure I heard that two of the three on the panel were “non football people”. What is that all about?
Was Rangers appeal for Alfredo's red card at Pittodrie not restricted to the primary view of the incident? I thought I remember them complaining about not accepting other evidence. Although I could be making it all up.
I thought you couldn't appeal a second yellow?
Should never have been a booking
Tribunal 'cannot be deemed competant' and the ruling 'cannot be deemed valid'.
Only telling us what we already know about these halfwits.
Making it up as they go along as usual.