Part of Matthew Lindsay's 'article' headed The Official Response quotes an SPFL spokesman, why a substitute, why no Doncaster or MacLennan ? Surely if it came from 'the top' it would carry more weight ?
Hiding?
In another 'article' Lindsay states that talks were held involving representatives from Scottish FA, SPFL, Scottish Government, Police Scotland, and the Football Safety Officers Association Scotland at Hampden last month following the debacle at Dundee.
As we used to say at work "When all's said and done, more is said than done".
If the use of pyro is against the law it is up to the police to enforce it.
If the ploice can't enforce it then the law is useless.
"But the clubs must do more" is the oft repeated mantra, so based on the above let's shove all the onus on to the clubs and I reckon that would be the summary of conclusions and actions resulting from that meeting.
Hiding?
In another 'article' Lindsay states that talks were held involving representatives from Scottish FA, SPFL, Scottish Government, Police Scotland, and the Football Safety Officers Association Scotland at Hampden last month following the debacle at Dundee.
As we used to say at work "When all's said and done, more is said than done".
If the use of pyro is against the law it is up to the police to enforce it.
If the ploice can't enforce it then the law is useless.
"But the clubs must do more" is the oft repeated mantra, so based on the above let's shove all the onus on to the clubs and I reckon that would be the summary of conclusions and actions resulting from that meeting.