bluetonic
Well-Known Member
I hate VARI was all for it prior to it being in use. But it is just ruining fan enjoyment with some farcical decisions!
I hate VARI was all for it prior to it being in use. But it is just ruining fan enjoyment with some farcical decisions!
What you on about? I'm talking about the Wolves goal chalked off against Leicester.I enjoy watching decisions be correct. I enjoy Rangers lifting cup trophies.
But if you're content with Celtic's offside goal, and no VAR, okay then.
This has nothing to do with Celtic. The incident you are referring to is a totally different scenario. I want VAR as well but the implementation matters. Not a fan of what happened tonight.I enjoy watching decisions be correct. I enjoy Rangers lifting cup trophies.
But if you're content with Celtic's offside goal, and no VAR, okay then.
Nah, it's just pesky and ruining football again.That pesky var getting things right again.
Aye right.We'd likely be top of the league and won the league cup if we had VAR up here.
This has nothing to do with Celtic. The incident you are referring to is a totally different scenario. I want VAR as well but the implementation matters. Not a fan of what happened tonight.
They wouldnt dare, it couldnt be hidden.If we had VAR in this country Liewell would select who decides. Much like the Compliance officer. It would be only to benefit cellik.
Hey, you brought them up.This has nothing to do with Celtic. The incident you are referring to is a totally different scenario. I want VAR as well but the implementation matters. Not a fan of what happened tonight.
I don't think anyone on here wishes for anything other than a level playing field, and if the whistle is in the mouth of a cheat then if the same sheat is viewing a television screen, nothing will change.Yet again, VAR disallow what looks like a good goal in the Wolves v Leicester game, all because the Wolves player's left foot was offside. At any other time, the goal would have stood. In my opinion VAR kills the game.
The only way I'd want it in is if the managers had at least two challenges.
But with the state of the Officiating in our game I feel like I'm between a rock and hard place.
VAR or Kevin Clancy ?
If you have to stop to think about that, you're a muppet !
It should be used for contentious calls, hand balls, penalties etc!I hate VAR
Totally agree, offside is now a farceIt should be used for contentious calls, hand balls, penalties etc!
The proposals for a challenge based VAR seem to be using tennis as an example. In that you don’t lose a challenge if you were right I.e. if you challenge and it is upheld, you still have 3 left. You only lose one if the challenge is denied.I’ve heard this a few times and don’t agree. So you lose a match to a shocker of a decision just because you’ve used up your 3 (or whatever) challenges on previous, similarly bad, decisions?? Not for me. It’s either all in or all out.
FIFA need to implement rule changes. Bring back the days where the benefit of the doubt was giving to the striker or there should be clear daylight. This heel, pinky or armpit crap is ruining fan enjoyment.Totally agree, offside is now a farce
Hey, you brought them up.
Go and read what you wrote.
To summarise:
I don't agree with the way VAR is used
I didn't agree with the goal tonight being disallowed. The linesman was right there and didn't flag. Let's be honest, nobody saw the offside. It was that minute.
I'd take VAR if workable amendments were made.
The current system has to be reviewed.
Managers have to have the challenge option
Refs need to use their monitor if challenged by a manager. And the ref only goes to a third party if he cant see anything conclusive.
These are opinions and up for discussion NOT argument
My apologies mate.I did not bring them up, a_weir did. I was replying to him, who was replying to you. I think you and me are in agreement bud. I agree with everything you said in this post and your last one.
I did not bring them up, a_weir did. I was replying to him, who was replying to you. I think you and me are in agreement bud. I agree with everything you said in this post and your last one.
Fair point. Precisely why it hasn’t been introduced here yet, they don’t need it.Not a chance.
Only one club will benefit from VAR if it is brought into the Scottish game.
We’d probably have the league cup in the trophy cabinet as wellWe wouldn’t be 10 points behind St pats if was up here.
But he was offside, and had the ref or linesman seen it, the goal would have been chopped off.He wasnt flagged offside, the ref never whistled he was offside.
I've made it clear how I feel about VAR in it's present form. I summarised my points.But he was offside, and had the ref or linesman seen it, the goal would have been chopped off.
There aren't degrees of offside, it's a binary option - you're either offside or you're not.
I’m more interested in what we would or wouldn’t have got.I was all for it prior to it being in use. But it is just ruining fan enjoyment with some farcical decisions!
Reads to me like the correct decision was made!Yet again, VAR disallow what looks like a good goal in the Wolves v Leicester game, all because the Wolves player's left foot was offside. At any other time, the goal would have stood. In my opinion VAR kills the game.
The only way I'd want it in is if the managers had at least two challenges.
But with the state of the Officiating in our game I feel like I'm between a rock and hard place.
Was it correct?Have you seen that decision?
Our enjoyment is being ruined just now with farcical decisions,bring it on.I was all for it prior to it being in use. But it is just ruining fan enjoyment with some farcical decisions!
I’m all for it but with the US approach, certain amount of time to review then if uncertain go with original decision.
Get the frustration at the stop start nature but if it gets it right in the end then....
Not really the same argument though.After it was 'forensically examined' by the guys in a building miles away.
The ref is not asking them look at it,he's being told they're looking at it.
It's not the type of football i enjoy watching.
He wasnt flagged offside, the ref never whistled he was offside.
Its the way the system is used that pisses supporters off. Did you hear the crowd and what they think of it....while everybody waited for a THIRD party to make the decision.
I struggle to see how, in this instance.Not a chance.
Only one club will benefit from VAR if it is brought into the Scottish game.
So, what would be your implementation then?This has nothing to do with Celtic. The incident you are referring to is a totally different scenario. I want VAR as well but the implementation matters. Not a fan of what happened tonight.
Maybe so but, there is incontrovertible, undeniable, evidence to be taken into account here.If we had VAR in this country Liewell would select who decides. Much like the Compliance officer. It would be only to benefit cellik.
Problem then is you're back to subjective decisions. VAR and offside is designed to have a clear on/off decision and as much as it's a bit of a joke at the moment the decisions are correct.Var is good, but the way it’s used could/must be used better.
The whole shoelace is offside nonsense is just that, Nonsense.
I’d implement a non digital added lines view for refs to look at, just like a paused tv with no extra inputs.
he then can decide if it’s off or onside from that
Nothing wrong with VAR.After it was 'forensically examined' by the guys in a building miles away.
The ref is not asking them look at it,he's being told they're looking at it.
It's not the type of football i enjoy watching.