At the time of the 2012 vote to decide what Rangers 'punishment' should be, the club had hoped that it would limited to them being relegated to the first division, just one rung below the top Scottish Premier League (SPL). Eventually, 25 of the 30 clubs in the Scottish Football League voted to eject Rangers and force them to start life in the 4th Division, at the bottom of the Scottish footballing pyramid.
Several clubs - Hibs, Dundee Hibs, and celtc as I recall, led the charge, with later's views being announced in a stomach-churning statement - "...the integrity of the game was of paramount importance" and that the "decision to refuse access into the SPL was an overwhelming one and demonstrates the depth of feeling amongst everyone involved in Scottish football..." It was this group plus a few others, that held out for the maximum sanction to be applied to Rangers. However, at the time a number of other clubs, I believe, Motherwell for e.g., who were hesitant about agreeing to such a drastic punishment, but were pressured into going along by their various supporters clubs who warned that unless they voted for the max punishment, they would not in future purchase season tickets, thereby undermining the financial stability of clubs that were already in a precarious position.
If a boycott of away fixtures were to be organized by Rangers supporters, would it be a blanket ban of all clubs, or one that was restricted to the prime movers behind the conspiracy, i.e.. - Hibs, Dundee Hibs, and celtc?