Superrangers
Well-Known Member
You are correct sir. Amazing what alcohol does to the brain.But still not plummeting as fast as Rod Hull.
You are correct sir. Amazing what alcohol does to the brain.But still not plummeting as fast as Rod Hull.
Dead Cert.Think I’ll put money on Ken Dodds (even though he’s dead) and see what happens.
Would be a beer carbon copy of souness
I know about bookies odds on manager markets but interesting this one
Think he is fishing mate.Murray did not bring Souness in
Wilson was coming into form just before he left. I'm not suggesting we wouldn't have needed another CB by keeping him. We do need a quality player in there. But Wilson is a great squad player. Having him would have helped us build depth of quality.I disagree that Wilson was our saviour with Bates. Bates I would have kept in a heartbeat but Wilson had many chances with many partners and failed in almost them all.
I was just saving TalkTalk the bother.Think he is fishing mate.
Low cost option, which you need in a squad.Wilson was coming into form just before he left. I'm not suggesting we wouldn't have needed another CB by keeping him. We do need a quality player in there. But Wilson is a great squad player. Having him would have helped us build depth of quality.
The is absolutely zero chance this will happen. Please do not worry.So another project appointment aka gamble aka disaster aka clueless board decision .... No no no no NOOOOO!!!
Frank DeBoer .We need someone who knows how to win league titles
Thanks mate , it’s been a long day, by the way do you like cats ?I was just saving TalkTalk the bother.
Love them!Thanks mate , it’s been a long day, by the way do you like cats ?
i really do hope you're fishing with that bold statementUnless we’re giving him 100m like Murray did when he brought Souness in i can’t see it..
Jordan Rossiter stuck 5 minutes on the treatment table getting a massages worth of wages on him for the job.
Out of hope more than him deing ITK.
Definitely you. As poorly written as it undoubtedly is, and as illiterate as I admittedly am. I think you'd need to take language skills to a whole new low to fail to get the point from the words used.It's it me going mad or is that completly unintelligible?
It doesn’t make sense to me neither. He’s not ITK I know that.It's it me going mad or is that completly unintelligible?
As were Wilton , Struth , White , Wallace , Greig and Smith.I do laugh at the people who on one hand reminisce about the appointment of Souness and then rubbish the likes of Gerrard coming in as a novice manager.
These people do realise that Souness was a novice manager don't they?
I do laugh at the people who on one hand reminisce about the appointment of Souness and then rubbish the likes of Gerrard coming in as a novice manager.
These people do realise that Souness was a novice manager don't they?
It’s even dumber when people use it as some sort of justification for lame suggestions like Gerrard. A completely different man at a completely different time under a completely different set of circumstances.
Ally was also a first time manager when he got the gig too. Worked a treat didn’t it.
This. While I do think in time he could be a good Manager, now is not time for gambles.
Think you will find Murray was nowhere near Ibrox when Souness came in it was David Holmes who appointed him, Murray got involved later.Unless we’re giving him 100m like Murray did when he brought Souness in i can’t see it..
These the same bookies who closed the books on Eck being appointed?
I posted it then, I'll post it now:
Bookies odds drift with the market and are used to make the bookie as much money as possible, they do not reflect reality.
This is why I've always thought taeHe’s a bheggar!!!!!!!!!
Murray did not bring Souness in and he definitely didn't give him £100m !Unless we’re giving him 100m like Murray did when he brought Souness in i can’t see it..
Well spotted. Imagine mark Allen missing this obvious flaw. Really lucky you are on top of your game and stopped us making a colossal mistake.He’s a bheggar!!!!!!!!!
Clarke is also relatively minimum risk.My take on this is someone like gerrard = heavy investment
Someone like Clarke = minimum investment
A figurehead to attract better players in the way Souness was, then we need an experienced assistant like Walter or someone to basically handle the running of the team.I’d take him get a good experienced man beside him he’s a huge name it would be a massive boost to our club worth the gamble imo
Neilson is an arsehole, does anyone rate him?The lift he would give the players who are staying on at the club would be immense. And the number of players wanting to come and play for Rangers under Gerrard would also increase tenfold.
But it won't happen and we'll get some arsehole like Neil, Clark or Neilson.
Certainly not me mate.Neilson is an arsehole, does anyone rate him?
Definitely you. As poorly written as it undoubtedly is, and as illiterate as I admittedly am. I think you'd need to take language skills to a whole new low to fail to get the point from the words used.
Or maybe I'm the one going mad. Since FF is nothing if not fair and balanced.
Murray didnt bring Souness in. It was David Holmes.Unless we’re giving him 100m like Murray did when he brought Souness in i can’t see it..