wee bud's pit boots
Well-Known Member
Attendance:38,560
Absolutely tremendous.
Attendance:38,560
Strange, they barely touched the ball the whole game.Sorry if this has ready been posted, but wtf bbc stats on possession!!!! 59% to Stranraer Incompetent FW
I would play Kennedy before Jones and Barker and let him learn he's got quality, Paterson looked decent againBarker is really out of his depth.
Not a game that favoured wingers but Barker and Jones were poor. Ojo not on for long enough to judge and did a bit more (including scoring a fine goal). Jones barely touched the ball which is inexcusable. Barker at least contributed more but mucked most of it up (especially denying Kennedy a goal on his debut). Aribo played the same role as them and was on the ball continually. And they were playing ahead of Halliday which should have given them space to play as true wingers if they wanted.
Worrying for their futures.
Sorry if this has ready been posted, but wtf bbc stats on possession!!!! 59% to Stranraer Incompetent FW
I honestly think he's got something as a player. We're just not getting the best out of him. On his day he is very capable.
You’d expect all six of them to start against St Mirren. I’m just glad we got this out the way and hopefully the rustiness out of five or six of them before we take St Mirren on. We need a huge improvement on that performance as we get back into the league games.Rangers reserves?
Katic, Davis, Jack, Arfield, Aribo and Defoe are not part of our reserves mate. It showed that our 1st team squad is very poor in terms of depth and quality.
As others have posted, our colts beat them 2-nil
Interesting big Wes saying Kennedy being the best in training and gaffer saying the same a think we have a good one ,anoni like what IV Sen but good when they recogniseNot a game that favoured wingers but Barker and Jones were poor. Ojo not on for long enough to judge and did a bit more (including scoring a fine goal). Jones barely touched the ball which is inexcusable. Barker at least contributed more but mucked most of it up (especially denying Kennedy a goal on his debut). Aribo played the same role as them and was on the ball continually. And they were playing ahead of Halliday which should have given them space to play as true wingers if they wanted.
Worrying for their futures.
And yet SG plays him. What am I missing ?I'll put this as polite as possible.
Brandon Barker should be nowhere near Ibrox.
Rangers reserves?
Katic, Davis, Jack, Arfield, Aribo and Defoe are not part of our reserves mate. It showed that our 1st team squad is very poor in terms of depth and quality.
As others have posted, our colts beat them 2-nil
Fair enough comment that Jones was told to tuck in, but Barker went into the exact same position when he came on. Surely he deserves the same slack?
Said it on another thread, I was more concerned about JJs lack of desire to make things happen than his general pishness last night. Barker, for all his faults, at least tried to do something, though just doesn't seem able to execute his ideas.Jones was playing for the first time in months that's why he gets slack that Barker doesn't.
TR, did you really watch what Barker did tonight? His major attribute was running directly into opposition players and gifting them the ball. He must have had some talent at some stage but for us he just doesn't look like a professional football player.
I will say this in defense of the Barkers of this world, though. I appreciate we have a way of playing but if the players who shine playing that way aren't on the pitch it makes no sense to me to require those who can't play that way to do just it anyway. The management should stop trying to be too clever and ask players do what they're best at. It was Stranraer.