It’s a conclusion based upon feck all substanceWithout wanting to bring it up again, and I don't hold anything against him for missing as it happens to everyone, but I think if he scores then the next frankfurt one misses. There would have been massive pressure on him, and as it was that fourth penalty of theirs was their worst and the only one mcgregor got near
If you listened to FF footballing experts we wouldn’t have McGregor, Tav, Jack, Lundstrum, Bassey…etc etc etc32% actually want him back.
Thats mental.
He barely played for us.. what was it? 3/4 starts?
Hes completely done as a professional footballer.
Na it's just an opinion mate. One which we're all entitled to.It’s a conclusion based upon feck all substance
“It’s a no from me too.”He could influence matches…these days not so much. He looked no better than Lowry. Which maybe is a good thing for young Alex.
32% actually want him back.
Thats mental.
He barely played for us.. what was it? 3/4 starts?
Hes completely done as a professional footballer.
If he does fine by me as I don't give a hoot about Scotland National Team these days,but still a no from me about him with us.But the boy can play all right. He’ll probably prove it against Scotlan!
The question was if fit and within wage structure would you take him. It’s completely hypothetical. Therefore his fitness / cost don’t come into the equation of the totally hypothetical question.It's alright saying "if we keep him fit" but that's literally it, he can't keep fit. We've seen it ourselves already. A big no from me unfortunately.
You need to be able to play a decent number games to be a very good player for Rangers. In half a season he made 7 league appearances ffs, 7 games and the odd flash of ability isn’t particularly good to be honest. If we’d gotten the same outcome from a player without that name and reputation it would be a flat “no” from just about everyone.Because he’s a very good player.
He was a very good player no doubt about that.Because he’s a very good player.
People seem to have forgot that if he scored it would only have been level .
Missing the potential winning goal in a European final being the difference I think tho.If you take that approach though, Tavernier wouldn’t have seen a season two and neither he nor Goldson would have been there after Gerrard’s first season.
Even if all the rangers fans wanted him back realistically I don’t think we could afford him, he will still be looking for a big money deal I would imagine, more than what we could afford for a player that never seemed fit. If he wasn’t fit enough to play most games then I don’t see what would change next season.
Both have had 7 appearances and both have 2 goals. I’d rather Lowry gets the game time to shine!!Lowry is now better
God no,
I actually hate the Welsh because of him
They are timposters?
We took up the last opportunity with him and it was a waste of time and moneyA huge YES for me.
oppertunities like this,don’t come around too often.
I can never tell if you’re at the wind up! But opportunity for what exactly? To sign a perma-crock who used to be an exceptional player?A huge YES for me.
oppertunities like this,don’t come around too often.
And can't take penalties.Big name, big ego, not good enough and outside the pay structure I would wager.....