Nothing on BBC Sport Scotland, Talksport, STV etc etc
God speed my friend.We have good and bad days mate but believe me we are all here for each other. There are days when of course it does get too much but we fight on. We have no choice.
Their greatest ever Captain said in open court in the original Torbett trial of 1996 that it was an "Open Secret" at the club.
No doubt there will be a 'Rangers are bad' article being written just now.I appear to have woken up in a parallel universe today. First the DR reporting this and now it's on the BBC.
Celtic to face 'class action' over Boys Club abuse
Could raising an action in this way be a bit risky.By way of background, this is a relatively new procedure introduced in the Court of Session in the last couple of years. Previously, these actions would either have had to have been raised separately and then conjoined for proof or as one "primary" action with the remaining pursuers entering process by way of minute. Raising an action in the Court of Session is not cheap and the process can be extremely off-putting even if those staff working in the Offices of Court in Edinburgh are as helpful and friendly as they are.
In terms of accessibility to justice I felt it was a good move when it was introduced and it will be interesting to see how it works in practice.
Class actions have been available in the US for many years and this process was only introduced in Scotland last yearCould raising an action in this way be a bit risky.
If it fails due to a technically does that then affect all 25 cases in the same way.
Would they all still have the right of appeal individually or do they have to all stick together?
I'm not entirely sure. I would think that the appeal would have to come as a group but this procedure is new and therefore relatively untested. One could argue, without seeing the writs of course, that if the claims are similar enough in character to be grouped together, and they fall due to a finding in fact of the Court, then they would all fall as individual actions in any case.Could raising an action in this way be a bit risky.
If it fails due to a technically does that then affect all 25 cases in the same way.
Would they all still have the right of appeal individually or do they have to all stick together?
Would this be due to a certain ex Director (with an allegedly dodgy memory) having a close relative in a senior position?
What do you expect the BBC are renown for hiding child abusers their list is endless, Saville, King, Hall & we are forced to finance that organisation , a national disgrace
Thanks for the reply.I'm not entirely sure. I would think that the appeal would have to come as a group but this procedure is new and therefore relatively untested. One could argue, without seeing the writs of course, that if the claims are similar enough in character to be grouped together, and they fall due to a finding in fact of the Court, then they would all fall as individual actions in any case.
From Donalda McKinnon to Steve Carson, those that have run BBC Scotland who have swept news just like Celtic FC, have no morals. To sweep news like this shows you their professionalism, or lack off. A disgusting organisation with history of this behaviour.
That’s a great point.I hope the Spotlight team and yourself have some sort of counselling service at hand if required.
What you have undertaken is harrowing. You have my respect.
Looks like the dam is about to break.
Well done to everyone on the team.
Look after yourselves.
This should have its own thread in The Lounge,More than 200,000 children sexually abused by French Catholic clergy, damning report finds
More than 200,000 children sexually abused by French Catholic clergy, damning report finds | CNN
Members of the Catholic clergy sexually abused more than 200,000 minors in France over the last seven decades, a survey carried out as part of an independent probe into abuse within the church estimates, according to the head of the commission that produced the report.edition.cnn.com
Saw that as well, surely this is something that will be easily verified? The accounts (unless shredded, burned or under the big carpet) either show the monsters been paid by cfc or not?
I’ve been a benefactor of many class action law suits over here over the years. Not big amounts, but given the number of participants in most of them, big totals. It’s very common practice. It’s very big business.Class actions have been available in the US for many years and this process was only introduced in Scotland last year
if they failed here I'm sure the victims could raise their actions for the goings on in the USA.
Police Scotland held their Child Safety Conference in Celtc ParkPolice Scotland should be all over that tatty disgusting club with a full investigation and arrests
I disagree. Not trying to start a conversation on the issue in France or distract from the thread, but the more people see it, the better. Not hidden away in the lounge.This should have its own thread in The Lounge,
This isn’t the place for it.
Luckily National Insurance contributions are shredder proof.Saw that as well, surely this is something that will be easily verified? The accounts (unless shredded, burned or under the big carpet) either show the monsters been paid by cfc or not?
They did to St.Patricks AND paid them to do it even though they are nothing to do with themI see this is now on the BBC Scotland news page, but not the top story. According to this article, the Rhats basically deny all knowledge and claim the boys club, which they also claim has nothing to do with them, does not exist anymore.
Didn’t they just change the name of the boys club ?
They did to St.Patricks AND paid them to do it even though they are nothing to do with them
Well said BN94 , What a sad shower of sh*t we have running the Country now , no attempt whatsoever from them to get an honest inquiry into the suffering of the victims . Pathetic .On another thread recently I regrettably had a bit of a let’s say disagreement with a nationalist openly.
I don’t usually lower myself to their level but sometimes like you say they make your blood boil.
To put nationalist votes before humanity is criminal. They have let down each and every victim and family member and I hope that’s what they are remembered for along with their other failures.
I love my country. I fought for it, but I hate what it has become. It breaks my heart if the truth be told.
I’ve held and aimed a rifle. I never thought I’d want to do that in my own country. We need to rid Scotland of this poison.
So the boys club does exist and Celtic FC arranged for a change of name.They did to St.Patricks AND paid them to do it even though they are nothing to do with them
Agreed Tazza, it's all so horrific.That’s a great point.
If this comes to an end, the Spotlight team plus GY plus BN plus every other helper are going to hit a wall.
You need to be aware of this and prepare for it.
They just said something very similarSo just heard the report on Absolute Radio of Celtic being sued by victims whilst they were at Celtic Boys Club..all going very well until it said even though they weren't formerly affiliated...christ I'm looking forward to that narrative exploding in their face.
This claim that they “do not have a formal affiliation” is what the lawyer’s will expose at trial and people will be in no doubtReport just been on Sky News. Couldnt believe my ears but I'm pretty sure the report culminates in a statement to the effect that 'Celtic & Celtic Boys Club do not have a formal affiliation'.
Reporter at pains to emphasise the 'do not'.
Thought it was a risky and potentially prejudicial comment for them to make in relation to a pending legal case. So taken aback I'll need to listen again to check my ears were working properly.
The point is why are Sky reporting this as a fact when it is central to the law suit? Who is feeding them that line? It is hugely prejudicial to the case that this is being broadcast on national TV and radio.This claim that they “do not have a formal affiliation” is what the lawyer’s will expose at trial and people will be in no doubt
The point is why are Sky reporting this as a fact when it is central to the law suit? Who is feeding them that line? It is hugely prejudicial to the case that this is bring broadcast on national TV and radio.