archimedes
Well-Known Member
The only players we should be taking on loan are the ones we have an option to buy, and that ain't Gilmour, so it's a no from me.
Twice.Voted yes or no.
Definatley Maybe .Definitely NO!
Laziness.Why is the first ‘yes or no’ option so far out in front?
Why would you not want a cracking player on loan?Id rather we didnt tbh.
Because we are better off buying players and developing them instead of someone elses..
Why would you not want a cracking player on loan?