It’s not easier , it’s the exact same thing on a bigger scale .It’s easier to get 50 fans to agree a move to the next section than it is to get several hundred to move to another part of the ground.
It is easier. Kilmarnock have thousands of empty seats people can move to.It’s not easier , it’s the exact same thing on a bigger scale .
There’s no point in making excuses - a blind man can see the club have dragged their heels on the subject . Apparently they have had all the costings done and know exactly what to do - they just have decided to delay it(again) . It’s not an expensive project by any means .
Let’s see if the promise of “ next year” comes to fruition . To be fair I will say that perhaps other areas are priority for this season .
Unless we have oversubscribed our seating, it can’t be harder or easier .It is easier. Kilmarnock have thousands of empty seats people can move to.
For what it’s worth, I’m in favour of safe standing but it’s far more difficult for our club to carry out because we don’t have many vacant seats to move people to.
Haha. Yes it was designed to stop Rangers doing.Celtic in cahoots with GCC agreed a 3 year trial. This was designed to stop us doing it. They needn't have bothered as we're starting year 4 with no action. We welcome the chase. Ha ha.
AgreeSafe standing is no guarantee for a better atmosphere unless RFC create the old rover style season tickets for that particular section.
Groups of mates or RSC’s together will help atmosphere, in conjunction with safe standing. But not on its own.
You also need to factor in people will see it as an opportunity to get a better view such as those in restricted view positions currently. They might have no interest in singing.
Kilmarnock have obviously done this to sort their young ‘ultras’ hence the relatively low numbers of seats being converted to safe standing.
Practicalities wise at Ibrox the enclosures lend themselves best to being converted to safe standing. The fronts of the Copland and Broomloan would restrict views of those in the Govan east and west corners and at the extremities of the enclosures.
Blackmail?Blackmailing folk is always a good look.
I'm in CD7, I know it'll never be up there.I do wonder how many people who are full support of safe standing at Ibrox sit in areas where they know they'll never be any chance of it being implemented.
And if the still don’t like it.... there’s plenty on the waiting list who’ll take their places.That they should be getting moved regardless, wee token 25% renewal discount for the annoyance.
You've made a massive arse of yourself if that's what you've taken from that post.Oh sorry, was I meant to feign horror at the idea to support your stupid notion that people are only in favour of safe standing as it won't affect them?
If you're not prepared for the answer, don't ask the question.
Apologies, you wondered rather than asked.You've made a massive arse of yourself if that's what you've taken from that post.
I also never asked a question, but you knew that already.
Well, anyone confusing a statement for a question and additionally misinterpreting that statement is making a fool of themselves, no?Apologies, you wondered rather than asked.
And you have the gall to say I'm making an arse of myself?
You wonder how those fans unaffected would react, I give you my say and you reply with a snide 'good for you'.
You've clearly implied that there are some in favour of safe standing purely from a point if view that it doesn't mean they move seats.
I'm currently in the Broomloan Front which the board are hell bent on turning into Safe-Standing despite the general opinion that it would be one of, if not the worst places to have it.I do wonder how many people who are full support of safe standing at Ibrox sit in areas where they know they'll never be any chance of it being implemented.
How about, we are changing eg Copland Front to Safe Standing. You can retain your position in the stadium or we can relocate you to a seated area.That they should be getting moved regardless, wee token 25% renewal discount for the annoyance.
Terrible location. Who wants a safe standing section split in two and hidden away from the tv audience? It should be given the highest profile possible.Agree
Can’t say I’m bothered about this issue, but reconverting the enclosures back to standing would be the obvious move if we did it