T for thick Celtic fan.Tam = Celtic fan
And a clownTam = Celtic fan
He is another clown, dangerousclownThat old walloper Keevins was saying we complain about everything.
A master of spin is the old prick.
Don't know why it has always stuck in my mind but oor Shoo has previously said of ClancyThat old walloper Keevins was saying we complain about everything.
A master of spin is the old prick.
I get pissed off even with ex players of ours coming out with all the shit of the day like charlie adams saying Gio must do this must do that, and the fact he takes the timmy pound for being on that not a show for us plz, Allan Hutton and Barry Ferguson as well as Alex Rae taking the timmy pound on super scum board having all their wee inputs and criticizing usWhy are nobodies like him even allowed a fuckin voice, the media in this country are as bad as the refs, incompetent and utter shite.I can’t remember the last time I read or listened to something that I thought was interesting or learned anything it’s all playing to the crowd shite for click bate replies on social media these days it appears
Including covering up sexual abuse YaeThat old walloper Keevins was saying we complain about everything.
A master of spin is the old prick.
Tim McAnusWhy is Tam McManus asked for his opinion on anything, ever?
An absolute nobody.
And that was not just a bunch, it was the whole box that was sour.Never heard a peep from this wee prick when his beloved Celtc were complaining or engaging every week with the SFA .They can't help making an absolute a rse of themselves in their eagerness to get a pop at the Gers......the only sour grapes is from them because of 55.
Of course. He even said that if it got discussed on Clyde he would leave.Including covering up sexual abuse Yae
Ah the Celtic fans view, knew it wouldn't be long.Tam McManus has accused Rangers of ‘sour grapes’ after their eight point complaint letter was handed to the SFA.
The Ibrox club have held talks with the governing body after Tuesday’s contentious 1-1 draw with Aberdeen.
But ex-Hibs striker McManus told PLZ Soccer, Rangers haven’t been consistent when it comes to complaints.
He said: “I think they’ve got a point because the referee was poor, lets not beat about the bush, the referee was poor on the night for both teams.
“To come out after that game in particular, when Rangers have not had a man sent off in over 2 years, it’s a wee bit sour grapes for me.
“There’s been decisions in the past where Rangers have benefitted, when Rangers players should have got sent off during games in key periods.
“Off the top of my head, Morelos stamping on Porteous and Rangers won the game 1-0. I think Morelos again with the swinging arm when he got done retrospectively.
“There’s been decisions that have gone Rangers’ way and they’ve never complained about it to the SFA.
“This decision has went against them, the first red card in over 2 years, and they go moaning to the SFA.
I presume you didn't see the game?Personally I think we are embarrassing ourselves a bit complaining over this, yes it wasn’t a red and maybe Hayes could have been a red, but at the end of the day if he had given the penalty, which it was , the sheep prob would have been 1-0 up instead of 1-0 down and would have won the match, we were pish and didn’t deserve 3 points, face up to it and concentrate on improving performance and signing a couple of well needed players for the first team
How do we know we aren’t doing this consistently? Could be this is a common occurrence we just aren’t told about until it’s ‘sour grapes’This will be the accepted media narrative.
We should have gone after Clancy like this when he failed to cheat us out of beating Celtic at the piggery as the best time to do it is after you win anyway.
By your inference if they got the penalty they would have scored and won the game easily. More wishful thinking on your part.I did aye and the major decision in the game was them not getting the penalty and us scoring 30 seconds later that wouldn’t have happened if they got the penalty. By the time Kent wS sent off we were being pinned back and made little difference anyway.. the rest is all over exaggerated pish from foams that canny handle that we dropped 2 points
Was always going to be reported this way , December 2019 was the time but dignified silence was the order of the day.Tam McManus has accused Rangers of ‘sour grapes’ after their eight point complaint letter was handed to the SFA.
The Ibrox club have held talks with the governing body after Tuesday’s contentious 1-1 draw with Aberdeen.
But ex-Hibs striker McManus told PLZ Soccer, Rangers haven’t been consistent when it comes to complaints.
He said: “I think they’ve got a point because the referee was poor, lets not beat about the bush, the referee was poor on the night for both teams.
“To come out after that game in particular, when Rangers have not had a man sent off in over 2 years, it’s a wee bit sour grapes for me.
“There’s been decisions in the past where Rangers have benefitted, when Rangers players should have got sent off during games in key periods.
“Off the top of my head, Morelos stamping on Porteous and Rangers won the game 1-0. I think Morelos again with the swinging arm when he got done retrospectively.
“There’s been decisions that have gone Rangers’ way and they’ve never complained about it to the SFA.
“This decision has went against them, the first red card in over 2 years, and they go moaning to the SFA.
That you Kevin?I did aye and the major decision in the game was them not getting the penalty and us scoring 30 seconds later that wouldn’t have happened if they got the penalty. By the time Kent wS sent off we were being pinned back and made little difference anyway.. the rest is all over exaggerated pish from foams that canny handle that we dropped 2 points
No, it wasn't!Was always going to be reported this way , December 2019 was the time but dignified silence was the order of the day.
I did aye and the major decision in the game was them not getting the penalty and us scoring 30 seconds later that wouldn’t have happened if they got the penalty. By the time Kent wS sent off we were being pinned back and made little difference anyway.. the rest is all over exaggerated pish from foams that canny handle that we dropped 2 points
Or NeilThat you Kevin?
Precisely and who are PLZ Soccer?
Hasn’t he got a paedophile to support?No one will be surprised that Spiers has devoted his Times column today to add to the criticism and has had a go at Stewart Robertson and Gerrard. In the same way as McManus, guess that the only people who care what Spiers think is himself and his employer.
Hahahahahaha.. you have said I am assuming they would have scored the penalty.. when I have clearly said probably ! And then had the added thickness to highlight it and use it in your argument. Wow !"the sheep prob would have been 1-0 up instead of 1-0 down and would have won the match, "
Above is your writing is it not?
celtic fan/fanny/dick any or all.
Nae bother JohnI did aye and the major decision in the game was them not getting the penalty and us scoring 30 seconds later that wouldn’t have happened if they got the penalty. By the time Kent wS sent off we were being pinned back and made little difference anyway.. the rest is all over exaggerated pish from foams that canny handle that we dropped 2 points
That's Nuts !IQ of a squirrels jobby.
There’s been decisions in the past that have gone Rangers way and they haven’t complained to the SFA. No shit Sherlock!