Cheers, Jase. I don't think having doubts about a rarely used squad player is grounds for exile, but if it helps I have seen him in every minute he has played and hope I am wrong in my assessment. If I am wrong I defer to your mighty 13 months on the site.As well as looking like you don't know what you're talking about, the fact that you are making judgement on a guy who has very few minutes in a Rangers shirt suggests that this might not be the right place for you.
All four plus Kent disappeared when the two st j subs, Kane/Rooney came on.Davis was MOTM immense yet again.
Hagi Jack and Aribo also superb.
Superb post Billy. Too many on here are bemoaning a (relatively) poor performance and picking holes in that performance, in a game where the opposition had one good shot on target we controlled the play with 67% possession.This season we've won impressively, we've won by grinding it out, we've won by eventually breaking down stubborn defence like we couldn't do the last two seasons, we've won with swagger and we've won with sweat and tears (and once or twice we've drawn), but we've won. One step closer to the prize. Loving it, loving it all, even the shit games. Well done Hagi, and my MOTM was Davis, again.
There was another 50%0 of the game to go.Where in my comment, made at half time is wrong?
4-1 at h/t agreed.Nope, not 90% empty at all, I just called it as I saw it. Missed 3 or 4 complete sitters, the game should have been out of sight at half time.
There was another 50%0 of the game to go.
Try 'hawding yer wheeshed' till the 70th min next time.
How the fück were we garbage if we created three or four chances that were sitters? We can be garbage; we can miss sitters but a team cannot be garbage and create three or four "sitters" in 45 minutes.Nope, not 90% empty at all, I just called it as I saw it. Missed 3 or 4 complete sitters, the game should have been out of sight at half time.
How the fück were we garbage if we created three or four chances that were sitters? We can be garbage; we can miss sitters but a team cannot be garbage and create three or four "sitters" in 45 minutes.
Not pretty, often dull, but we created all the best chances and scored a terrific goal.
It feels brilliant to know this is a Rangers team who win any way necessary.
FYI It's 17 months. But perhaps you can explain the relevance to the discussion.Cheers, Jase. I don't think having doubts about a rarely used squad player is grounds for exile, but if it helps I have seen him in every minute he has played and hope I am wrong in my assessment. If I am wrong I defer to your mighty 13 months on the site.
I said this at half time. It was garbage at half time was it not?
Bit stupid going back 20 pages to pick comments out is in not?
Have you tried WD-40 ?Concerning stuff as the yahoos have closed the gap on us this midweek by a whopping three goals.
Squeaky bum time
Some embarrassing stuff on the match thread, for what these players have given us this season for people to be going off their nut because it was 0-0 at halftime is ridiculous, thank fuc* there's not them type of fans at Ibrox this season
Pish is idiomatic, and a regional term. It means 'of poor quality'. I accept that I could have used better terminology to cater for the weak and easily offended so in that regard you, specifically, have my apologies.FYI It's 17 months. But perhaps you can explain the relevance to the discussion.
I've also watched him and I have a different opinion to you but that's fine. What's not so good is calling a player 'pish' before he has had a real chance. We're supposed to be supporting the squad.
Stop with the unpleasantness. Langland being conciliatory. I don't happen to agree with him but we are all bears, let's look at the game a sa good 3 points against a stuffy team and a step closer to 55.FYI It's 17 months. But perhaps you can explain the relevance to the discussion.
I've also watched him and I have a different opinion to you but that's fine. What's not so good is calling a player 'pish' before he has had a real chance. We're supposed to be supporting the squad.
It wasn't garbage though it's a total over reaction. We were in total control of the ball and had four clear chances. That isn't garbage.
Aribo or Davis for me, both were excellent.Went with Aribo motm .Hagi had a good game and great goal but his touch and close control let him down at times .Jack and Davis excellent too
Was Tav limping at the end .Looked like a groin strain
Swithered between him and Hagi.Ryan Jack didn't waste a ball tonight, can’t believe only 10% voted him as MOTM.
He was blowing out his arse mate.Nervy end but it's 3 points. Lost something taking off Hagi. Should have been Kent.
For me Hagi MOTM closely followed by Jack.
Agree, because it's full of zoomers.May as well just not have a match thread then shall we?
Why the 70th minute? Why not the 75th minute?
This is a controversial view but one I agree with.Genuinely think no fans has helped us so much this season.
Not really, just use words you mean.Okay the issue here is I use the term garbage for things like poor, rubbish, not good enough.
I forget you need to be 100% clear on what you say and mean on the internet because people take a fit at the slightest thing.
I have myself taken umbrage with people who cannot not spell his name correctly so that is fair comment. However you could correctly call me out on that and still respond. Methinks you have no response to the substantial point. He has done little wrong but does not deserve a starting place.Not taking anything seriously from someone who hasn't bothered to actually learn the guys name
It's 5 letters ffs
I've already responded to it in this thread.I have myself taken umbrage with people who cannot not spell his name correctly so that is fair comment. However you could correctly call me out on that and still respond. Methinks you have no response to the substantial point. He has done little wrong but does not deserve a starting place.
You were talking absolute drivel and I responded politely to your drivel; and you had no reply.
Who’s being unpleasant?Stop with the unpleasantness. Langland being conciliatory. I don't happen to agree with him but we are all bears, let's look at the game a sa good 3 points against a stuffy team and a step closer to 55.
I have two problems here.I am just posting about a player on a football forum. I hope he comes good, as do all Rangers fans. As for vulgarity, it's a common idiom. I haven't seen much from him but hope he improves as time goes on/he gets chances.
Genuinely think no fans has helped us so much this season.
Fair enough reply! But, and I say this in a friendly, conciliatory manner, garbage is a fairly emphatic statement and not a figure of speech. And yes I have very often vented my anger at players at a game ; it is one of the reasons I stay off the match thread! However I gently disagree with your point that we were garbage; the fact that we created four chances suggests otherwise.It's more so just a figure of speech ffs. Wrap it a bit.
Have you ever been at a game and a player has missed a chance and said "that's s***e" from the player. Does it mean they are bad? No, it's just a forum and a match thread that the vast majority of people vent on.
Tough conditions, poor pitch.
1-0 or 1-1.
truth......If someone with no knowledge of the league table was allowed to read the majority of every match thread the only logical conclusion they could come to is that Rangers were bottom of the league.