perthtruebluetwo
Well-Known Member
Garbage where was barisic for the first goal, he gave Boyle an age to pick out the cross.Is no-one interested in the fact that he was yet again culpable at both goals ?
Garbage where was barisic for the first goal, he gave Boyle an age to pick out the cross.Is no-one interested in the fact that he was yet again culpable at both goals ?
If Tav was on the bench today some would blame him for the goalsWhat a load of clueless shite.
The first goal comes from Borna giving Boyle too much space and then Steven Davis getting sucked into the front post and leaving Wright in acres of space.
The 2nd goal came from a loose pass from Goldson, followed by a very poor offside call by the assistant referee.
Try watching a sport you know something about, if there is such a thing.
Doidge had both hands on Helander.I also agree that Helander has to be stronger in his attempts to win the ball for the 2nd.
Genuine question, was he fouled? Or was Doidge just up above him and before him and therefore able to keep him down legally?
Borna was teased a little by Boyle’s apparently heavy initial touch, so he went to commit and realised he wasn’t getting there.
I didn’t think Doidge fouled Helander.Doidge had both hands on Helander.
Back in the 80's it wasn't.I didn’t think Doidge fouled Helander.
I dunno mate. Maybe need to watch it another couple of times. My initial thought was “just go and foul him” after he’d semi committed and realised he wasn’t gonna get there.Have to admit, that's not how I saw it at all. Barisic got surprised by Boyles heavy touch and didn't know what to do. The touch was that heavy that the ball could've been easily won by Barisic if he fancied it.....but he didn't.
Good oneTav would have been a decent full back 40 years ago. For Morton. He’s not Rangers class.
Is no-one interested in the fact that he was yet again culpable at both goals ?
Mental, Barisic stinking for the first goal at Tav gets the blame for it
If Tav laboured up to his man the way Barisic did the Rangers Das would have exploded.
"Rangers' Das"? What the hell is that meant to mean? Too old to have an opinion?
You're having a laugh. Barisic doesn't cut out the cross for the first one and Goldson has a complete brain fart and that's before the obvious offside by the linesman but aye let's dig Tav out. Jesus Christ.Is no-one interested in the fact that he was yet again culpable at both goals ?
Anyone who doesn't think Tav has actual haters need only read this^^ absolute pile of horse shite.Is no-one interested in the fact that he was yet again culpable at both goals ?
No opinions permitted then. We continually lose goals from rb position. His stats look good but ! Wait for it most of the good ones came in lower leagues. I have followed Rangers for over 40 years and I mean going to the games over 50 overseas. He is the equivalent of Ally Dawson.I would delete this thread. I'm critical of Tav, but there was many others more culpable today. Many!
Defo mate. Barisic was sleeping at the firstHe was our best player today by some distance.
No he wasn’t?Is no-one interested in the fact that he was yet again culpable at both goals ?
No opinions permitted then. We continually lose goals from rb position. His stats look good but ! Wait for it most of the good ones came in lower leagues. I have followed Rangers for over 40 years and I mean going to the games over 50 overseas. He is the equivalent of Ally Dawson.
Who i thought was pish but nice guy.
No he wasn’t?
Had a good drink in me but unless I’ve lost the plot Barisic wAs sleeping at the first and our centre half’s were sleeping at the second.No player is above criticism but it's truly baffling when people try to shoehorn the blame onto someone – on what planet is Tav the one to blame for both those goals?
Just get a gripIs no-one interested in the fact that he was yet again culpable at both goals ?
Someone is gonna need to explain to me how losing a goal on the left is Tavs faultJust get a grip
you are right but what is wrong with him,he has the talent no doubt, but.I thought hagi was terrible 1st half. But I also feel he was at his best the 10 mins or so before he was subbed.
The one where it was the left back who was too far inside at the first cross then gave the Hibs player room to cross easily?Is no-one interested in the fact that he was yet again culpable at both goals ?
That would explain why the formation and tactics we had when 2-1 ahead, created gilt edge chances for four different players?The real problem - and the one that should worry us more than anything - was that Jack Ross changed it immediately after our second goal. He switched his shape and tactical approach in order to create the opportunity for overloads against both our full backs. Gerrard didn’t react and our midfield were hopelessly incapable of making it difficult for them to shift the ball into those wide areas and create those opportunities.
SG got outsmarted by Jack Ross. Let that sink in.
Funnily enough, this happens quite regularly when a player in a defensive position makes a mistake.He gives us a huge amount going forward, unfortunately when he does make mistakes they almost always cost us
FFS, we had more clear cut chances than Hibs after Ross’s masterstroke.Unlike our guy I am afraid mate.
You’ve just proven my point about opinion being the lowest form of human knowledge. Well done youIs no-one interested in the fact that he was yet again culpable at both goals ?
FFS, we had more clear cut chances than Hibs after Ross’s masterstroke.
Does that not count.
Was it Ross’s masterstroke that caused Goldson’s error?
Don’t mate you’d have a better time banging your head off a wallThe one where it was the left back who was too far inside at the first cross then gave the Hibs player room to cross easily?
What boils my piss at times is when we get a free kick on the left hand side high up the pitch and Tav runs 100 odd yards (to take him well out of position) over to take it ahead of Borna who in my opinion delivers a far more dangerous ball. I get that sometimes inswinger V outswinger is tactical but play to the strength of the team and have your best player at delivering crosses take them rather than your captain roaming around the pitch to take free kicks that he shouldn’t be near... not a Tav bashing reply here btw, more of a frustrated observation from a frustrated bear!Didn’t do particularly well at the second goal but wasn’t exactly the one who cost us 2 points today.
For me the bit that summed up why I don’t get the overwhelming praise for Tavernier was the free kick at the end, it summed up my issue with him and most of this team. There’s a few minutes left and you badly need a goal at an often tricky venue to stop the scum having the chance to build a points lead, in that moment we need a good ball and as happens all too often, he gets it badly wrong in the pressure moment and gives their keeper what was essentially a pass back.
Haha don’t hold backWhat is the OP talking about, absolute banger
Mental mate!Don't waste your time arguing with the clueless, Tazza.
Don't waste your time arguing with the clueless, Tazza.
I know.Mental mate!
Had the same idea mate, told myself don’t log on it’ll make you more angryI know.
I come on (first mistake) promising myself not to engage with these guys.
It lasts ten minutes, which is better than the five it used to.
Next week, I’ll try for the whole fifteen minutes!
He must have had some season in his one lower league year to have racked up “most” of his 49 goals and 77 assists in one year.No opinions permitted then. We continually lose goals from rb position. His stats look good but ! Wait for it most of the good ones came in lower leagues. I have followed Rangers for over 40 years and I mean going to the games over 50 overseas. He is the equivalent of Ally Dawson.
Who i thought was pish but nice guy.
Haha don’t hold back