Robert Marshall
Well-Known Member
I think there are so many questions's arising out of the non-transparency that an EGM is neededI would trust Joanne 100% but I’m not sure if she is aware of some of what has been going on.
I think there are so many questions's arising out of the non-transparency that an EGM is neededI would trust Joanne 100% but I’m not sure if she is aware of some of what has been going on.
Rangers First CIC was apolitical as a body, every single individual member I knew joined to force Regime change.Forget Rangers First,they were apolitical which is no good to anybody.
The people I am talking about have enough self-belief and do not need the 'Ego' of being a Club 1872 Board member but would put the Support and the Club first.Those individuals would find it easy to get on the board/gain some control?
Should have said that the Directors of Club 1872 should have no control, they are there purely to express the views of the Members.The people I am talking about have enough self-belief and do not need the 'Ego' of being a Club 1872 Board member but would put the Support and the Club first.
After all the Support and the Club are the one and the same
The people I am talking about have enough self-belief and do not need the 'Ego' of being a Club 1872 Board member but would put the Support and the Club first.
After all the Support and the Club are the one and the same
I would trust Joanne 100% but I’m not sure if she is aware of some of what has been going on.
Friends of yours running C1872 and your son as SLO would be a great scenario for at least one Rangers fan.IMO it is a fact, I know decent people who would step up if required. All I would need to do is ask them.
Passive aggressive quote of the day.Friends of yours running C1872 and your son as SLO would be a great scenario for at least one Rangers fan.
Thanks @Christine1872. I thought two ladies had gone over from RST. My mistake for assuming one was Laura.
I would trust Joanne 100% but I’m not sure if she is aware of some of what has been going on.
Was Christine1872 not one of them? I'm sure I voted for her to get on the board.
All Rangers fans are my friendsFriends of yours running C1872 and your son as SLO would be a great scenario for at least one Rangers fan.
So by the process of elimination peoples problems are with Laura Fawkes?
Only in an ideal world Robert.All Rangers fans are my friends
Whatever is going on, or has gone on, it would be nice to have a bit of transparency on the situation for all of us members who continue to put faith into the board by contributing to the cause every month.
I appreciate not every C1872 messageboard rumour that suddenly appears on here or elsewhere should trigger a response from the C1872 board - far from it. However, the post earlier with the email from former board member Mr MacQuarrie, leads to more questions than answers.
Transparency.
I say Robert talking about RF in those terms will get this thread binnedRangers First CIC was apolitical as a body, every single individual member I knew joined to force Regime change.
We raised about a million pounds towards buying shares to vote the last Board out, not bad for being ' no good to anybody'.
We only got Regime change because we had enough votes to oust them
Dave King didn't think RF was ' no good to anyone'
You are being very insulting to at least 12000 Rangers fans.
It was a post and run earlier mate but I agree about giving her the right to defend herself, it's quite clear it is her they're talking about but no one has the bollocks to say it. Little wonder any supporters group ends up a sham when there is a thread like this full of adults hinting about stuff like children.Reading between the lines it appears so , although it would perhaps be prudent to give her a chance to defend herself against these allegations . It’s all very saddening to hear , when we are doing so well in other areas of the club . The reverend Macquarie’s words worry me - we should be seeking this to be clarified ASAP
Rangers First CIC was apolitical as a body, every single individual member I knew joined to force Regime change.
We raised about a million pounds towards buying shares to vote the last Board out, not bad for being ' no good to anybody'.
We only got Regime change because we had enough votes to oust them
Dave King didn't think RF was ' no good to anyone'
You are being very insulting to at least 12000 Rangers fans.
It was a post and run earlier mate but I agree about giving her the right to defend herself, it's quite clear it is her they're talking about but no one has the bollocks to say it. Little wonder any supporters group ends up a sham when there is a thread like this full of adults hinting about stuff like children.
I don't know nor have I ever met Laura but this thread is an embarrassment.
Why is people seeking explanations embarrassing?Disagree
Too much has happened for it to take off again
It needs binned.
A new group would be needed, free of any controversial figures that split the support
It is the way the conversation is going that is embarrassing, nudge nudge wink wink Laura Laura etc just come out and say what it is or why bother? Adults acting like 6th form prefects who are in the know.Why is people seeking explanations embarrassing?
Checked my details and seem to be on hold , tells me to update details but I can't find a way to do it. They must be losing some amount of money. I never knew I was on hold till all this cropped up on the thread.
Thanks Mate I must have missed that post .You didn’t read post #199 did you? Furthermore, reading a few other posts it appears that contributions have continued as normal. Check your bank account and all should be apparent on that score I guess.
Certainly appears some clarity for members is needed nevertheless.
I could never get the true figure as you know we had a few wrong ones mixed amongst the very goodSeville Loyal
Sorry, which one?Sorry Robert, but you haven't answered the question that was posed.
Why is people seeking explanations embarrassing?
You need to give something like !872, RST, RF all the time it needs not the time when it suits you.There seems to be a lack of enthusiasm at club 1872 and too me its being run like a part time job.
Its not very organised.
The phrase “ its ma ba and your not getting a shot “ comes to mind.
Totally agree , especially when fans are putting there hard earned cash into something.You need to give something like !872, RST, RF all the time it needs not the time when it suits you.
It is a big commitment
Another new group, what a great idea. Rip up a perfectly good formula instead of fixing things with an EGM.Disagree
Too much has happened for it to take off again
It needs binned.
A new group would be needed, free of any controversial figures that split the support
Another new group, what a great idea. Rip up a perfectly good formula instead of fixing things with an EGM.
C1872 is two people. One on the board one in the background.
Only fans that didn't want what was best for the ClubDamage has already been done IMO
The merge of RF and RST into what is basically now c1872 meant from the start it was always going to be hard to get everyone on board given that some sections of fans had issues with the RST and RF
Rangers First CIC was apolitical as a body, every single individual member I knew joined to force Regime change.
We raised about a million pounds towards buying shares to vote the last Board out, not bad for being ' no good to anybody'.
We only got Regime change because we had enough votes to oust them
Dave King didn't think RF was ' no good to anyone'
You are being very insulting to at least 12000 Rangers fans.
C1872 is two people. One on the board one in the background.
I agree, concentrate on doing positive things for the whole fanbaseThis is the thing, people want different things from c1872, personally I just want them to be a fan ownership vehicle and would rather we got no fan activism from them.
Perhaps he means on the board of C1872Lies.
c1872 have nobody on the board.
Jhog on.
C1872 is two people. One on the board one in the background.
No idea how he thinks I would gain by having friends on the Board of 1872?Passive aggressive quote of the day.
Indeed, but it doesn't null and void the reason why I don't contribute which was what my point was.If you no longer contribute then your opinion is null and void.
It's like people complaining about the government but don't vote
Rangers supporters would fight each other just to get to the top seat.Fan ownership you say?
I say no thanks......ever!
Not nudge nudge for me. I want to see proper governance from a 5% Shareholder Group that’s representing us. We can hardly complain about transparency when this is being run like a closed shop.It is the way the conversation is going that is embarrassing, nudge nudge wink wink Laura Laura etc just come out and say what it is or why bother? Adults acting like 6th form prefects who are in the know.
I think this is the Crux of the matterNot nudge nudge for me. I want to see proper governance from a 5% Shareholder Group that’s representing us. We can hardly complain about transparency when this is being run like a closed shop.
Why are they soo quiet, since 2018 have they actually pushed for more members? Have they had another members meeting. What projects have they been involved in?I think this is the Crux of the matter
I would trust Joanne 100% but I’m not sure if she is aware of some of what has been going on.
And there you have the 64000$ questionWhy are they soo quiet, since 2018 have they actually pushed for more members? Have they had another members meeting. What projects have they been involved in?