RangersLad1983
Well-Known Member
We don't riotThat's not offside, he wasn't interfering.
If that was the other way around we would have rioted if that was chalked off.
We don't riotThat's not offside, he wasn't interfering.
If that was the other way around we would have rioted if that was chalked off.
Be good if our keeper could come for a nothing cross for once, honestly.
For what?
He's not in the line of the ball.I can’t understand why VAR didn’t pull it up. All goals are checked and the guy is offside standing right in front of McGregor.
No he didn't.Striker a mile offside blocked the keepers view (therefore interfered with play)
I would if the post had any credibility, comes across as a 5 year old post. There was absolutely nothing wrong with the goalYou know you can reply without insults don't you?
No I want him to be confident enough to come off his line reading a cross that was absolutely terrible. Nobody will convince me Mclaughlin doesn’t come and take that ball in the air preventing the ball being headed out for the player to volley it. Some strike but completely avoidable IMO.What's the relevance of this? You want him to run 25 yards out to stop the shot from ever happening?
In an offside position, not offside though.
Ball leaving the goalscorers foot... Offside no doubt
Yup, McLaughlin would have came and claimed thatBe good if our keeper could come for a nothing cross for once, honestly.
Is that the rule?In an offside position, not offside though.
The Rangers players are blocking McGregor's view more than RB's.
No I want him to be confident enough to come off his line reading a cross that was absolutely terrible. Nobody will convince me Mclaughlin doesn’t come and take that ball in the air preventing the ball being headed out for the player to volley it. Some strike but completely avoidable IMO.
Ball leaving the goalscorers foot... Offside no doubt
I would if the post had any credibility, comes across as a 5 year old post. There was absolutely nothing wrong with the goal
If they aren't interfering then yes, it is the rule.Is that the rule?
Worth it. With VAR in the mix i can't understand why we didn't chase the ref.
Clown.Never offside fs.
I haven't seen it back but pretty sure the knock back came from quite a bit quite wide and definitely outside the 6 yard box. I don't think any keeper in the world is coming to get that
Clown.
hard to call. From the first angle, I would say he was definitely in the way. Second angle, he might have been off to the side.
Never offside fs.
How do you know that? Did you get a confirmation on your Tv?Why chase the Ref? VAR looked at it and said it was fine. Offside I thought but they must reckon Greegs had a view of it anyway.
Let me ask you a question. Do players need to ask the question for VAR to be checked?You know you can reply without insults don't you?
Aye but some half wits in our support do incredible mental gymnastics to try and blame McGregor for absolutely every goal we concede this season. It’s mind numbing shite.I haven't seen it back but pretty sure the knock back came from quite a bit quite wide and definitely outside the 6 yard box. I don't think any keeper in the world is coming to get that
I know it because I know how VAR works mate. Every goal is reviewed by the officials. Running about with your hand in the air doesn't change that.How do you know that? Did you get a confirmation on your Tv?
He isNever offside fs.
Not sure you have to appeal.Worth it. With VAR in the mix i can't understand why we didn't chase the ref.
100% offside.
Should have been disallowed
They never give these for some weird reason. Same as the 6 seconds!I thought it was offside. The guy is in an offside position in front of MCGregor, he actually has to jump out of the way of the shot. He’s offside.
Never even thought about it but it might be a good shout….For what? Usually needs a foul or an offside to appeal for something.