ScotiaPapac
Well-Known Member
Why would that be any better?Looks tacky a f imo.
We should of just went for a blue-chip company sponsoring Ibrox.
Why would that be any better?Looks tacky a f imo.
We should of just went for a blue-chip company sponsoring Ibrox.
It really is simple it would bring in far more money imo than some tacky sticker from a unknown company.Why would that be any better?
I’m with you. This had better be big money. Otherwise that’s a fucking embarrassment.It looks utter shit. I’m not one of the people who will happy make our stadium look tacky for a wee bit of money, so its a no from me all day long.
And a blue chip would give us money and not have their name plastered everywhere?Looks tacky a f imo.
We should of just went for a blue-chip company sponsoring Ibrox.
Would you be happy to watch Rangers at the Pepsi Arena?It really is simple it would bring in far more money imo than some tacky sticker from a unknown company.
It was only a fortnight ago that I found out that was a punanyone remember the Motherwell shitty advert running the full length of the stand ?
‘Keep cigarettes away from the match’
The name of the stadium ain't the same as changing name of the club. If someone offered us between 5/10 million a year to sponsor the stadium that everyone outside of journalists and TV presenters would still call Ibrox anyway we'd be off our heads not to take it. It's as close as you can get to money for nothing.Would you be happy to watch Rangers at the Pepsi Arena?
Why not go the whole hog and sell the naming rights for the entire club if it gets us more money in your opinion?
So if it had been "bovril" put up instead of biowave there would have been no outrage?.Aye, but 'tradition' and all that.
Sun saying its going up on Broomloan too.Sorry if I've missed it, is the signage on the Copland only? Or on other stands too?
It looks alot better than the ugly wrapping banner on the back of the standsOn Broomloan as well......
Turbo raginOn Broomloan as well......
On Broomloan as well......
FucksakeI’m with you. This had better be big money. Otherwise that’s a fucking embarrassment.
And the concrete on both Copland and Broomloan 'still' needs a proper clean. No excuse for that. It's a mess.It looks alot better than the ugly wrapping banner on the back of the stands
And the point of advertising is..........?Forgive my ignorance but wtf is biowave?
Oh come on. It’s a complete no-mark company and I’ll bet you they’re not paying big money to have stands named after them effectively, based on the placement of their stickers. I admire most of what Bisgrove has done but all these sponsors are tinpot. How many folk had heard of Seko, Topcat tyres, Bitchslap and this mob? Ultimately we are hitting Euro group stages every season now (long May it continue) and there are at least 4 televised OF games a season. We should be attracting bigger and better. Not Tier 1 sponsors obviously but surely bigger than these efforts.Fucksake
Stands effectively named after them?Oh come on. It’s a complete no-mark company and I’ll bet you they’re not paying big money to have stands named after them effectively, based on the placement of their stickers. I admire most of what Bisgrove has done but all these sponsors are tinpot. How many folk had heard of Seko, Topcat tyres, Bitchslap and this mob? Ultimately we are hitting Euro group stages every season now (long May it continue) and there are at least 4 televised OF games a season. We should be attracting bigger and better. Not Tier 1 sponsors obviously but surely bigger than these efforts.
Ah well just aswell I watch the pitch and not the roof during games eh lolGoing on Broomloan as well according to the sun.
Which has high profile on matchdays. I hope that the next shirt sponsor is higher profile but don’t hold out much hope.Stands effectively named after them?
That’ll cause confusion when people get their tickets if there’s two of them.
It’s literally an empty space that hardly gets any exposure.
High profile to the people inside the stadium perhaps, not on television.Which has high profile on matchdays. I hope that the next shirt sponsor is higher profile but don’t hold out much hope.
Aye just did Hap, one of those drug free pain signal blockers, her indoors tried something similar when she was in labour then quickly sacked it off and screamed for an epidural.And the point of advertising is..........?
Look them up.
It's money for not very much. Club say its substantial so all good as far as I'm concerned.I have to be honest, I’m struggling I see the outrage here. There is advertising along the bottom and middle of the stand. What makes the top of it sacrosanct?
Do I like it? No. Does it bother me any more than the boards across the middle of the stand? Still no.
The thing is it's not being renamed. It's just logos going up to co-ordinate with advertising and being in a 2 year deal with Rangers women and on mens training bibs. I'm not against the idea however I would like to to tie in with the rest of the stadium. I.e want the interior design of stadium to be top notch, everything co ordinates and attention to detail be up a few levels. We getting there but still some way to go.I don't mind a stand being named as long as its not the stadium being renamed.
Yes. Pictures of both stands being done earlier in this thread mate.Both stands apparently
In our last accounts, we lost 17 million pounds. 17 million. The year before we lost around 12 million. No fans this year means our losses, despite increased commercial revenues will be significantly higher. We could be looking at cumulative losses over 3 years of around 50 million pounds. How would you plug the gap? We also need to reman competitive by building our squad. Our benefactors cannot continue to bank roll our club.Of course, but as above, this isn’t some huge multinational. It’s a moderate company.
There must be a ‘price’ on flogging these sorts of things and for the sake of, say, £50k, I’d rather not have two big, ugly logos on the roof. Just like I think CAPITAL LETTERS looks rubbish.
It was Charles Green who said “I’ll take a cheque off anybody” and was largely reviled so I’m not sure why we now take the view everything’s for sale.
What would you do to close the funding gap we have? We are looking at a gap of circa 50 million over 3 years?You won’t get any argument from me that I’ve become more cynical in my old age. Although I’m surprised someone with your CV would pull anyone up for over-analysing and/or holding the Board to account, particularly over the last decade!
I have an ongoing concern regarding our sustained, substantial, losses and it’s perfectly legitimate to critique the Board in terms of their ideas for revenue generation. Things like roof sponsorship, dodgy Radio partnerships etc seem fairly scattershot to me. Conversely, Nord makes perfect sense.
Just my two cents.
No excuse?!!And the concrete on both Copland and Broomloan 'still' needs a proper clean. No excuse for that. It's a mess.
FFS - are you tying to tell me that the concrete strips at the top of both Copland and Broomloan, on the outside, are beyond any sort of clean up?! Seriously?No excuse?!!
Seriously? Care to give us a cost breakdown of the work seeing as you appear to have all the answers and intimate knowledge of the maintenance program of the club?