Nightman
Well-Known Member
Okay let’s say we don’t accept it. Do we keep him for the year and lose him for nothing?Short term financial thinker? Christ you should work in parliament mate
Actually the correct description would be risk adverse. We should absolutely not be accepting what is essentially a guaranteed £6m and a possible further £4m for a player of his calibre, especially when the buying club can comfortably afford it.
What would you do if you had the decision to make?