Now and forever
Well-Known Member
We can wipe that smugness next week.
If so then fair enough but it must of been a quick check then as game kicked off quickly.But… it was checked. All goals are.
Mmmm, see what you are getting at. It is more a point of fact though (i.e. blocking of the keepers view), than say a foul for a penalty could be imho.I will revert to your superior knowledge of Var but do you not think it deserved a look by the ref?
They didn’t mention it because they don’t need to. It happens automatically.If so then fair enough but it must of been a quick check then as game kicked off quickly.
Also none of the commentators even mentioned that a VAR check was in progress as they usually get notified which made me doubt it was actually checked.
How not ?!
I'm astonished that after all these years of VAR posters - on a football forum - seem genuinely unaware that every goal is subject to a VAR review. Quite remarkable.
Post #111How not ?!
Of course not - but that's not the gist of this thread. Its very much 'we should have appealed and they'd have looked at it' - as if it wasn't already 'looked at'.Yes, every goal is checked. That doesn't mean every decision is 100% correct.
I’m more perturbed by the fact that as the weeks and months go by more and more of our support seem determined to adopt the dhims’ “always cheated never defeated” mantra.I'm astonished that after all these years of VAR posters - on a football forum - seem genuinely unaware that every goal is subject to a VAR review. Quite remarkable.
I suppose u would have to be in the VAR Room to know all the angles for definite, but safe to say there will be camera's behind the goal and at the side of the pitch.You only have to go back to the game at Ibrox a giant Dortmund to see how VAR can get things wrong. It all depends on what footage and angle they are looking at. If the ref at Ibrox that night had seen all the angles then the Rangers 'winner‘ wouldn’t have been chopped off. Who knows what footage/angles they looked at tonight?
Hardly m8, just stating the facts. I am desperate to get through.why don't you
again the Ferry coming with the support of the opposition
Seemingly the Referee tonight hasn't given a penalty in any of his UEFA matches this season. Just our luck, eh?I want to know why we did not get our penalty. Does the Ref and VAR not understand that we get one in all these type of ties. Their goal was fine and I am happy it was only one. Means we get two penalties at Ibrox lol.
If that’s at the other end and gets chopped off, folk would be pissing boiling blood on here about cheating refs. Nothing surer.I thought it was offside, but after a few replays he is away to the side, not in direct eyeline. If anything McGregor is unsighted by a few of our players.
The ball has travelled a bit here and McGregor's view still isn't blocked.
There's also a fair gap between him and the RB player.
There may have been a case if the ball went flying into his left hand post but it goes to his right hand. The only players blocking his view are Rangers players unfortunately.
Referees and linesman are 100% calling players coming back from an offside position (an awful rule) but if a player is affecting the line of sight he would need to have been gouging the keeper's eyes out before a foul is given.Hardly m8, just stating the facts. I am desperate to get through.
I'm astonished that after all these years of VAR posters - on a football forum - seem genuinely unaware that every goal is subject to a VAR review. Quite remarkable.
The ball has travelled a bit here and McGregor's view still isn't blocked.
There's also a fair gap between him and the RB player.
There may have been a case if the ball went flying into his left hand post but it goes to his right hand. The only players blocking his view are Rangers players unfortunately.
Don’t get the ‘obviously’ in this comment, like VAR is the daddy? It’s been proved wrong plenty, and I agree with the OP that the player is in Shag’s line of site all day long!Obviously not or var would have looked at it .
The cross itself was dealt with, the goal was a great strike. Did not see anything that we should feel nervous about next week, last two rounds have been against far better teams than them imoBe good if our keeper could come for a nothing cross for once, honestly.
I think your seriously mistaken, we didn’t trouble their keeper and had around 36% possession, without the ball you don’t score. We don’t have a natural striker, just don’t see anyway we put two by them but I could be totally wrong.The cross itself was dealt with, the goal was a great strike. Did not see anything that we should feel nervous about next week, last two rounds have been against far better teams than them imo
Purely to get in the refs face....or something like that.For what?
This. You can tell a lot about the correctness of a decision by the players reaction.If McGregor was unsighted you can bet your bollocks he’d be the first one bursting the referees ears.
But Alan McGregor wasn't distracted.I can’t understand why VAR didn’t pull it up. All goals are checked and the guy is offside standing right in front of McGregor.
The fact he dived for it probably suggests he saw it, albeit maybe late, hence he missed it. I thought two players looked offside from the replay. We'll beat them next week though.Why chase the Ref? VAR looked at it and said it was fine. Offside I thought but they must reckon Greegs had a view of it anyway.
Why did Mcgregor not go mental then if his view was blocked ? He would have been going bonkers at the ref if this was true.Nobody is clutching at straws pal.
I don’t think anybody disagrees that it was a wonder strike, however the guy is an offside position (no debate about that) and also looks to be interfering with McGregors line of sight so it’s a valid question as to ask why wasn’t it checked.
Nothing desperate about asking the question as none of the commentators picked up on it either, albeit it’s a valid question.
You’re right but that won’t stop the smarty pants “look at me, I don’t like McGregor anymore either” posters looking for a way to blame McGregor.I haven't seen it back but pretty sure the knock back came from quite a bit quite wide and definitely outside the 6 yard box. I don't think any keeper in the world is coming to get that
Would have taken 1-0 before the game!Straw clutching with that. It was a great strike and we've done well with 1-0.
I’m sure if he was then McGregor would have gone after the refOffside player blocking McGregors eyeline
Let’s make this clear all goals are considered for VARWorth it. With VAR in the mix i can't understand why we didn't chase the ref.
They check all goalsOffside by a couple of yards and had to jump out the way of the shot so definitely blocking McGregors view. Would be interesting to see if they checked it.
Just wait till next season. People complaining that they haven’t reviewed why we didn’t get a throw in.I'm astonished that after all these years of VAR posters - on a football forum - seem genuinely unaware that every goal is subject to a VAR review. Quite remarkable.
Would have taken 1-0 before the game!
It’s should have been disallowed. The guy was blatantly offside and in shagger’s line of sight.VAR would have checked it.
Spot on. Can't believe this goal stood. McGregor's line of sight is clearly occluded by the head and upper body of the Leipzig player running in front of McGregor.
Ball leaving the goalscorers foot... Offside no doubt