Tagsbear
Well-Known Member
I'm told we don't have that bounce game Tags - where did you get that from?
Perhaps been cancelled, it was definitely supposed to be happening.
I'm told we don't have that bounce game Tags - where did you get that from?
Not possible to go for more than the release clauseWhat if he goes for more? As you know, it’s not set in stone.
It has to benefit both clubs. Before folk come back at me, yeah I know how clauses work but he could go for more or less in actuality
I’d accept him going for less than the release clause but with a sell on. End up with more money in the long run as I expect he will be fantastic down there and could end up moving again for 20/30m with the crazy money in England.Will be bedlam on here if he goes for less than the release clause
Sorry, didn't see that post. Just surprised that posters thought we might leave him home because a bid might get agreed. Its only Portugal.Was there not a post earlier saying that some of the players weren’t joining up in Portugal until Wednesday and Thursday? If accurate, I’d imagine Aribo would be one of them.
That's proper incel chatBotheim is just a footballing whore. He'd have signed for any chunt for a bag of sand.
Not possible to go for more than the release clause
Try half that at best.
I don't agree.Correct. I bet he gets no more than half of it I though,
Think that is pretty unlikely albeit it would be an acceptable dealI’d accept him going for less than the release clause but with a sell on. End up with more money in the long run as I expect he will be fantastic down there and could end up moving again for 20/30m with the crazy money in England.
I don't think it's simply about getting a fee and having more money to spend.If I had to take a punt I'd say this is probably where we are.
There are maybe deals to be done for players, but do you fill the key positions with guys for around £1M - £2M when you know you might have more money to play with in 3-4 weeks time?
I think we'll get players in but it is probably going to go right up until the end of the window.
I give us very little chance of having a settled side ready to go for those qualifying games.
We’ll see what happens like but if he was to go for more id have thought some lower bids wouldve happened by now
I’d imagine an initial cash portion of a little less than the £10m but maybe add ons / sell ons etc take it over the £10m should certain conditions be met?I don't understand how you could possibly get more than the buy out clause, that doesn't make any sense whatsoever!
That’s how we acquire a lot of players. I’m sure Morelos never dreamt of playing for us, but money talks and we were the best option at the time.Botheim is just a footballing whore. He'd have signed for any chunt for a bag of sand.
Negotiate a new deal that’s of more value, but paid in instalments as opposed to a lump sum, or out of generosity just pay moreI don't understand how you could possibly get more than the buy out clause, that doesn't make any sense whatsoever!
Would imagine it would be a deal where majority of the money wouldn’t be paid upfront whereas the release clause demands it is.I don't understand how you could possibly get more than the buy out clause, that doesn't make any sense whatsoever!
A release clause is generally one lump sum.I don't understand how you could possibly get more than the buy out clause, that doesn't make any sense whatsoever!
Not true. The release clause will mean the club need to pay it up in full now. Teams might be happy to pay extra to not use the release clause and pay in instalments/ certain criteria met. All the release clause does is mean we can’t refuse the offer if the club say they are meeting itNot possible to go for more than the release clause
I don't understand how you could possibly get more than the buy out clause, that doesn't make any sense whatsoever!
If we can't get 10m for a player who has shown his quality in the European arena when the parkheed lot get 13m for Ajer and 16m for shot gun Eddie, in a team constantly pumped in Europe, then something is seriously wrong at our clubs recruitment department.They won’t open at £10m.
If he’s refused to sign a new deal, if I was them, I’d start at £6m.
I don’t think we’ll see the full £10m.
We have to sell and they’ll know that - we can’t afford for him to walk for free.
If rangers would accept 3 x 5m installments rather than 10m upfront we could agree to that for a very crude example.I don't understand how you could possibly get more than the buy out clause, that doesn't make any sense whatsoever!
It doesn’t matter what Wilson etc says, like it or not they have a recent history of selling players who have played well down south Van Dijk, Wanyama etc we don’t, these things come into it.If we can't get 10m for a player who has shown his quality in the European arena when the parkheed lot get 13m for Ajer and 16m for shot gun Eddie, in a team constantly pumped in Europe, then something is seriously wrong at our clubs recruitment department.
Let’s say there’s a club who are really tight with their FFP budget this season. They might offer more than the release clause to do a deal in instalments. So rather than £10m up front, it might be £12m over 3 years. They get the player for an initial £4m down and we get an extra £2m overall. Win/win.I don't understand how you could possibly get more than the buy out clause, that doesn't make any sense whatsoever!
You can’t, it’s madness. People seem to be thinking they are playing championship manager and not the real world.I don't understand how you could possibly get more than the buy out clause, that doesn't make any sense whatsoever!
I think it's probably both.I don't think it's simply about getting a fee and having more money to spend.
We may have targets to replace these guys if they do go thus summer, but you can't recruit a replacement at £25k/week whilst the player they're replacing is still there and under contract. It would be risky financially.
Negotiate a new deal that’s of more value, but paid in instalments as opposed to a lump sum, or out of generosity just pay more
I don't understand how you could possibly get more than the buy out clause, that doesn't make any sense whatsoever!
What could we have done though if they didn't want to sign new deals and no acceptable bids were coming in for them?Gerrard and Wilson f%cked up last summer by allowing 3 hugely valuable assets to run their contracts down simultaneously.
We're I'm a position where the 3 players and their potential suitors hold all the aces.
Champ Nana hard? The hell is that?You can’t, it’s madness. People seem to be thinking they are playing champ Nana hard and not the real world.
If Aribo goes it will be for the £10 million not a penny less and not a penny more if that is his legally contracted release amount.
You can’t, it’s madness. People seem to be thinking they are playing champ Nana hard and not the real world.
If Aribo goes it will be for the £10 million not a penny less and not a penny more if that is his legally contracted release amount.
Quite rightly.Will be bedlam on here if he goes for less than the release clause
Terrible move for any player.
You’re the one playing champ man mate.You can’t, it’s madness. People seem to be thinking they are playing champ Nana hard and not the real world.
If Aribo goes it will be for the £10 million not a penny less and not a penny more if that is his legally contracted release amount.
Lovelace any good folk, never actually seen him play
It’s widely known what his release clause is and, I‘m sure, his Agent will also have been making all and sundry aware if Aribo wants to move, what he’s looking for and what Rangers are asking.If we can't get 10m for a player who has shown his quality in the European arena when the parkheed lot get 13m for Ajer and 16m for shot gun Eddie, in a team constantly pumped in Europe, then something is seriously wrong at our clubs recruitment department.
They'll need wages as well.If Aribo goes hopefully it kick starts some signings.
Take the £10M and sign 2 or 3 genuine first team starters.
Because they didn't offer the whole lot up front and the structure of the deal on the table wasn't acceptable to Liverpool.See the thing with release clauses, anyone remember Liverpool basically said ‘naw’ when Arsenal bidded for Suarez?
I don’t get it
The thing about Suarez, as far as I know, didn't have a release clause. Liverpool sold him for a year or so later for a lot more. I think Arsenal believed there was oneSee the thing with release clauses, anyone remember Liverpool basically said ‘naw’ when Arsenal bidded for Suarez?
I don’t get it
I typed manager someone’s changed that or it’s been this daft phoneChamp Nana hard? The hell is that?
And Rigobert Song.Except Rino Gattuso
Depends, for example what if they offered £8million up front with a 15 or 20% sell on fee?Quite rightly.
Not just in here btw.
That would make sense. Don’t remember it at the time right enough.Because they didn't offer the whole lot up front and the structure of the deal on the table wasn't acceptable to Liverpool.
If Arsenal had offered the full release clause figure up front, then they wouldn't have been able to say 'naw'.
F.uck knows how your auto text came up with that.You can’t, it’s madness. People seem to be thinking they are playing champ Nana hard and not the real world.
If Aribo goes it will be for the £10 million not a penny less and not a penny more if that is his legally contracted release amount.
Well there’s 5 teams in for himI’d imagine an initial cash portion of a little less than the £10m but maybe add ons / sell ons etc take it over the £10m should certain conditions be met?
No wonder, he's a total fud. Credibility in tatters!
No different from the weekend stories.I assume the Aribo talksport story has been posted? Just get this done asap