First paragraph "at a boys club". A? Fcuking A boys club? Just some random wee team eh?
They categorically state "which was not affiliated", which is increasingly looking like a lie. How are they allowed to print that.
Surely worst case scenario, I.e. being most lenient to the paedos club, you state that "Celtic deny formal affiliation yet there is significant and growing evidence they are inextricably linked".
Surely that is honest reporting by unbiased press.
All these papers printing as fact they are not affiliated, is that not colouring court cases and perverting the course of law? To outright state as fact that which is questionable at best and a lie at worst.
Disgraceful
Edit: thanks for sharing Rangerista.
Big Steve, I'm not legally qualified or anything, but, I think this is borderline contempt of court when discussing a live case, albeit a civil one.