car93los
Well-Known Member
Fair play mate I'll watch again.Wrong all our players were shouting hand ball and surroundinget Clancy.
Fair play mate I'll watch again.Wrong all our players were shouting hand ball and surroundinget Clancy.
Yes, path of least resistance. Easier to give the call to them and not have the trial by media or windows panned in.Cheated then ?
Yet another who doesn’t believe his own eyes, quite remarkable really.A poor ref but not a cheat imo.
I think it was a close call and he took the easy option and awarded the free kick against us. My opinion is that they have kicked up such a fuss over the years that refs run scared of them and they get the decisions more often than not, I don't believe Clancy set out to cheat us intentionally on Sunday.Cheated then ?
None of us saw it first time on tv, the camera is in the main stand.Watching on TV I never saw it first time, I think he may have missed it hitting his hand, no one from our team claimed for a handball and the commentary team never saw it at first glance, mistake yes cheating not for me.
It’s a classic Stewart Robertson cop out, trying his arse off not to be controversial so much he starts his statement not criticising referees when if he sticks to the facts by his actions Clancy crucifies himself.A subtle dig you say?
It's a cop out pure and simple.
I've based my opinion on what I saw therefore I do believe my own eyes. What you find remarkable is that I disagree with youYet another who doesn’t believe his own eyes, quite remarkable really.
Again fair enough I've watched it back and they both appeal for the hand ball although I disagree they had the same view as Clancy, I've explained my thoughts on why I think he got that wrong.None of us saw it first time on tv, the camera is in the main stand.
Tav and Goldson both appealed before the ball even hit the net, they had the same view as Clancy.
The commentators have the same view as us on TV.
If you don't think he cheated, what major decisions favoured us?
Honest mistakes would surely have a balance against both sides.
So even after the replays of all the incidents you still think Clancy made honest mistakes?I've based my opinion on what I saw therefore I do believe my own eyes. What you find remarkable is that I disagree with you
Where did you watch it back?Again fair enough I've watched it back and they both appeal for the hand ball although I disagree they had the same view as Clancy, I've explained my thoughts on why I think he got that wrong.
He could have ordered a retake of the penalty as Goldson is in the box before its struck so you could consider that a major decision he got wrong in our favour.
It was honestly the worst referring performance I have seen against us in all my time following Rangers, 10x worse than the Beaton Rangers vs Hibs game.
I can understand him being soft with the second yellows for the scum players if we were 4 or 5 goals up but being a 2-1 game and refusing to send off their LB or the wee guy Christie was baffling.
So do you think Clancy, Collum & Beaton are working independently or as a triumvirate to cheat against us or do you think having 1 club with so much power over the game, a victim mentality, a support who will stoop to the lowest of the low, intimidation and incompetent part time referees without the use of var is the more likely?So even after the replays of all the incidents you still think Clancy made honest mistakes?
Seriously a trip to your nearest opticians wouldn’t go amiss that’s if you can find it.
The comments the club made after the game particularly with reference to VAR they made it clear that they weren't criticising the referee...just that he perhaps needed more help to get the big calls correct!
A very subtle dig without landing in hot water with the beaks.
Step up Club1872!
I'll put it down to a typed conversation, I agree tav and Goldson claimed for it I disagreed with you that they had the same view.Where did you watch it back?
1min50, he's clearly got a view as good as Goldson and Tav.
If you see Goldson in the box before the penalty is taken, then you must see the mentally challenged with orange boots on the same side of the 'D' walk in too?
About 20secs in on the same video.
So both sides encroached, but neither player either scored or cleared so ordering a retake simply wasn't an option.
Now we've cleared that up, can you give me an actual call that went in our favour?
I've clearly explained that I saw Goldson in the box along with a mentally challenged.I'll put it down to a typed conversation, I agree tav and Goldson claimed for it I disagreed with you that they had the same view.
Did you see Goldson in the box before the pen? Now if the ref would have ordered a retake for a saved penalty because one of the takers team mates encroached I may be inclined to agree that he could be a cheat.
The handball yes
Last man tackle yes
Christie second yellow yes
Left back second yellow yes
Based on the decisions that have went against us on the past few weeks yes I think var would have went in our favour, I think we should have the system in place yes.
The frustrating thing is how the press made such a big deal this time last year about John Beaton failing to send Morelos off. They had an absolute field day with it. It was a story for the sake of a story and it only came out a few days after, there was no complaints at the time.
Now you have a whole host of terrible decisions and the press want nothing to do with it.
Celtic should’ve had 3 players sent off. Julien, Bolingoli and Christie.
Scott Brown could easily have received a yellow for his elbow on Tav. He would then get sent off with his next challenge.
We should have had a penalty for the shirt pulling on Aribo and the 2 footed challenge by Christie is a foul and potentially a red card.
So, that’s 4 Celtic players (Christie, twice) who could’ve been sent off, us denied a clear penalty. Imagine if the shoe was on the other foot, it would be an outrage.
Worst refereeing performance I’ve ever seen, even worse than ‘Rangers man’ John Beaton in the August 2017 Hibs game.
That was a particularly bad piece of refereeing where he got it totally wrong and we should have indeed went to town on him, especially as he had been the same referee, who had through his earlier 'errors', ensured that our title challenge was damaged from the first match, up at Pittodrie.
Again he had made a serious error in sending off Morelos and failing to show a red to Dominic Ball.
Given that he had so injuriously affected Alfie in previous games, one might have thought that given how lenient he had been with Christie and Bolongoli and that the match was in its sixth minute of a four-minute injury time period, he might have cut Alfie some of the slack that he actually owed the wee man.
However, Kevin 'the lady's front bottom' Clancy isn't cut from that type of decent cloth.
We all know what Kevin is, we all now know it because there can be no dispute, no debate and no naysayers.
Needless to say, the bold Mr Beale certainly knew it.
Why the 2 extra minutes on top of the stated 4 minutes added time then?I think it was a close call and he took the easy option and awarded the free kick against us. My opinion is that they have kicked up such a fuss over the years that refs run scared of them and they get the decisions more often than not, I don't believe Clancy set out to cheat us intentionally on Sunday.
He should be called out on everything and we take the fine or whatever punishment comes our way after it.
It's too important and this clown has to be hounded out of this league.
Next game he refs of ours we must boo him the entire game and give him absolute hell.
2 of our players called out the handball immediately and Clancy was looking straight at the incident.Watching on TV I never saw it first time, I think he may have missed it hitting his hand, no one from our team claimed for a handball and the commentary team never saw it at first glance, mistake yes cheating not for me.
Watching on TV I never saw it first time, I think he may have missed it hitting his hand, no one from our team claimed for a handball and the commentary team never saw it at first glance, mistake yes cheating not for me.
He didn’t miss any of the incidents, he chose to make the decisions in favour of them. A blatant cheat, and if he’s not called out he will continue to help beat us. At the very least he should never be allowed to officiate in any game, in any capacity involving them or us.That's not true is it? Tav and Goldson immediately claim it. He also has a better view than you or I had initially since he is directly behind it.
He didn't miss it. It was impossible to miss it. The ball travels downwards in to the net, despite travelling upwards when it left McGregors foot. There is only one part of Edouard's body it could have hit to make the ball change trajectory in that way.
He didn't miss it. He CHOSE not to give it as handball.
He’s either downright incompetent or horrifically bitter and biased. There is no 3rd option and I know what my view is.
Must be removed from his current position, on another day that performance from him goes down in history.
That's totally wrong, our players did claim and walker did mention it at the timeWatching on TV I never saw it first time, I think he may have missed it hitting his hand, no one from our team claimed for a handball and the commentary team never saw it at first glance, mistake yes cheating not for me.
If our 2 players do a christie and bolingolie we get 2 second yellows it's really that simple, then there's a whole catalogue of inconsistencies beside that, he's a cheat was doing his best in front of Liewell etcI'm convinced it wasn't bad refereeing but instead very sinister. I'd normally go down the road of thinking he's a hopeless c***. I'm actually in shock at that performance. Seeing pics of him, he knows he disgraced himself in front of the world.
The frustrating thing is how the press made such a big deal this time last year about John Beaton failing to send Morelos off. They had an absolute field day with it. It was a story for the sake of a story and it only came out a few days after, there was no complaints at the time.
Now you have a whole host of terrible decisions and the press want nothing to do with it.
Celtic should’ve had 3 players sent off. Julien, Bolingoli and Christie.
Scott Brown could easily have received a yellow for his elbow on Tav. He would then get sent off with his next challenge.
We should have had a penalty for the shirt pulling on Aribo and the 2 footed challenge by Christie is a foul and potentially a red card.
So, that’s 4 Celtic players (Christie, twice) who could’ve been sent off, us denied a clear penalty. Imagine if the shoe was on the other foot, it would be an outrage.
Worst refereeing performance I’ve ever seen, even worse than ‘Rangers man’ John Beaton in the August 2017 Hibs game.
I may be wrong on this but didn,t he send Alfie of on the advice of the linesman .Who admitted that he hand,t actually seen the incident .but went on the Aberdeen players reaction.That was a particularly bad piece of refereeing where he got it totally wrong and we should have indeed went to town on him, especially as he had been the same referee, who had through his earlier 'errors', ensured that our title challenge was damaged from the first match, up at Pittodrie.
Again he had made a serious error in sending off Morelos and failing to show a red to Dominic Ball.
Given that he had so injuriously affected Alfie in previous games, one might have thought that given how lenient he had been with Christie and Bolongoli and that the match was in its sixth minute of a four-minute injury time period, he might have cut Alfie some of the slack that he actually owed the wee man.
However, Kevin 'the cvunt' Clancy isn't cut from that type of decent cloth.
We all know what Kevin is, we all now know it because there can be no dispute, no debate and no naysayers.
Needless to say, the bold Mr Beale certainly knew it.
Well, would you believe it was the same linesman on Sunday that missed the blatant off the ball barge by CJ on AM?I may be wrong on this but didn,t he send Alfie of on the advice of the linesman .Who admitted that he hand,t actually seen the incident .but went on the Aberdeen players reaction.
Referees from south of the border or Europe is the way to go, mistakes are hard to take but corruption is totally unacceptable, the club could even offer to pay (further ramping up the cheating charge)CLub need to publically express they have no confidence in this individual
We should be pushing for outside refs in my view along with VAR.
i wish people would stop posting this, the evidence is there to show he isnt incompetent but an out and out cheat. If it was incompetence where are the decisions that went in our favour?
Heis a cheat and a very competent cheat. We should've been horsing celtic by a good few goals but that rat kept them in it and has even managed to get morelos banned for a few games. mentally challenged man of the match by a distance imo
The complicit mentally challenged infested mhedia are ignoring the prick Clancy’s performance on Sunday as the poets benefited from all his decisions
Clancy should be finished as a referee
He is clearly toxic and cannot be trusted
I don’t believe a referee or assistant referees can make all these mistakes and be allowed to continue in top flight games in Scotland
They missed far too many incidents and IMO deliberately tried to facilitate a win for the mentally challengeds
Hopefully Stewart Robertson is demanding Clancy is sacked
He cannot be allowed to continue otherwise he will keep performing like he did on Sunday
He has previous against us and enough is enough
Agree 110%.
I included the incompetent angle merely to give balance to my statement. I thought it was the single worst refereeing performance in an old firm game I’ve ever witnessed. And it wasn’t down to incompetence...
I'd go further, it is the worst I've seen in any game ever.
Byron Moreno in the 2002 World Cup was about as close as you'll get.
If you are referring to the Italy/Korea game then you’ve won the bad ref top trumps with that
Clancy was utterly shocking. I prefer to talk about how fantastic a performance was put in by Rangers but it can’t be overstated enough how vital it is that he never gets near another game. On another day he costs Rangers big time.
If you put a refereeing performance like that in the movie a shot at glory, you'd be chased for making it far too unbelievable.Clancy should not be allowed any official football match again ever anywhere His only excuse would be he had a bet on with some bookies it was like watching an movie where the good guys have to overcome all sorts of skullduggery to prevail planty college movies like that Clancy would be the pantomime villain except he was for real
What you've just described is cheating.I think it was a close call and he took the easy option and awarded the free kick against us. My opinion is that they have kicked up such a fuss over the years that refs run scared of them and they get the decisions more often than not, I don't believe Clancy set out to cheat us intentionally on Sunday.
Why do they have to be working together?So do you think Clancy, Collum & Beaton are working independently or as a triumvirate to cheat against us or do you think having 1 club with so much power over the game, a victim mentality, a support who will stoop to the lowest of the low, intimidation and incompetent part time referees without the use of var is the more likely?
Sorry Hehaw didn't mean to quote you
he has cost us though by ensuring morelos is now banned.